Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muzzy (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No opposition to a redirect being created later on as an {{r with possibilities}}. Primefac (talk) 13:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Muzzy (musician)

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All refs are trivial, blogs or not independent. Nothing reliable and substantial . No evidence of notability. Fails

WP:MUSIC Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep Muzzy has released 6 EPs on a notable indie label (
criteria 5. Micro (Talk) 12:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment - since part of the ethics of Monstercat is to provide a platform to allow new artists to release records, the use of that label does not suggest notability. There is no evidence that any of the releases achieved any chart success. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Monstercat is notable as a record label as it meets the GNG Micro (Talk) 01:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to have done a guest mix for Radio 1, but the (download only) releases on Monstercat don't constitute two albums on one of the more important independent labels. No significant coverage found in reliable sources. No criterion of
WP:NMUSIC satisfied. --Michig (talk) 07:22, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect to
talk) 00:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 09:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I do not see any significant coverage in reliable independent sources, so this fails
WP:NMUSIC may be met by the 6 EP's released on Monstercat, after consideration I do not think this criteria is met. The Monstercat label is relatively close to being self-produced, not relevant industry releases. As none of the EP's charted of generated significant sales, I would say that they did not become relevant and therefore by extension have not contributed to the notability of this article. Dysklyver 13:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.