Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NaFIRS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete.

WP:REFUND applies. Randykitty (talk) 18:23, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

NaFIRS

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:PRIMARY and not sufficient to establish notability of this. At best, a soft delete and merge to Distribution network operator or another better target if found could be considered. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:08, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:15, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:15, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: *Merge: To
Sussex Declaration BBC news snippet fame for an hour and it gives me some inspiration. On dePROD I noted Ofgen reference, Infrastructure Asset Management with Power System Applications isbn: 978-1498708678, Handbook of Reliability Engineering isbn:1852338415, Control and Automation of Electrical Power Distribution Systems isbn: 1351837354 but I can't remember for the life of me their content at the moment. But I feel a merging humming in the wires.Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:11, 12 May 2019 (UTC) per nom.Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.