Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nine Lives (Def Leppard song) (2nd nomination)

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Delete, then create fresh redirect that cannot simply be reverted to previously deleted article. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nine Lives (Def Leppard song)

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Nine Lives (Def Leppard song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously redirected as a result of

WP:BEFORE search fails to come up with anything to establish notability. John B123 (talk) 19:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect and
salt: article has been recreated and re-redirected numerous times since that first AfD, including once less than a month after the AfD. Clearly, Martiniturbide disagrees with that result as they've been the one restoring the article every time (and they have a statement here expressing as much), but everything that was said in 2009 still holds true, as does everything said in this nomination. Given their history, it seems safe to assume Martiniturbide wouldn't cease their activity even with a renewed consensus, so I supporting salting to prevent further disruption. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 21:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
I don't understand why Wikipedian think that the article is irrelevant while there are other artist that have their singles articles. It is just explained that it does not fit the "notability guidelines" and does not provide details. The deletion of this page is subjective to the wikipedian humor. I disagreed with you "Salting" and I can not find evidence of your statement that "everything that was said in 2009 still holds true". Martiniturbide (talk) 22:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't shown how it passes any of the criteria for
WP:RS. Richard3120 (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Which specific criteria? For me it covers the criteria. The page you link says "..may be notable if it meets at least one of these criteria".
non-trivial: It is a non-trivial Def Leppard song since it is the first time the band records a duet in a studio record. Also Tim McGraw is a well recognized American country singer. Martiniturbide (talk) 12:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just because its their first duet doesn't automatically make it notable, and neither does the fact it features another notable singer. It's simply your assumption that it being a duet makes it non-trivial. You haven't shown that there is anything else to say about this song apart from those two facts. Richard3120 (talk) 15:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect(/partial merge): Does not currently meet
    WP:HEY away). There's occasional 1-2 line qualitative coverage, but is there anything in depth of this particular song? Tim McGraw's guesting is already in the album article. Other highlighted claims to noteworthiness can be included in that paragraph, etc. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 06:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nine_Lives_(Def_Leppard_song)_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1230350433"