Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open PLA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Open PLA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software. The article currently has one dead link and no sources. I can't find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to meet

WP:GNG. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete: Subject lacks notability. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 14:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete apart from it being barely an article, a basic
WP:BEFORE turned up nothing usable in Google, GNews or GBooks ... is there anywhere else one might find RS coverage? - David Gerard (talk) 15:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete As a LibreOffice database template, this specialized piece of software does not seem to have generated any independent reviews that I could find. Without any reliable sources, this topic fails notability guidelines and precludes merging as well. Hence, deletion is warranted. --Mark viking (talk) 21:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.