Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owu Kingdom

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (

talk 21:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Owu Kingdom

Owu Kingdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails

WP:RELIABLE Jamzy4 (talk) 20:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, needs sources on the page, and fast. But this is definitely meets GNG.--Prisencolin (talk) 03:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep Owu Kingdom is clearly notable, based on all the books which include extensive information about it. Article needs a huge amount of improvement but that is not a valid reason for deletion. CrispyGlover (talk) 20:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.