Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pascal Stil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was moved to Draft:Pascal Stil. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pascal Stil

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this person satisfies

WP:TOOSOON and the article can be redirected to one of the two tournament articles. Otherwise, I think is should be deleted for a lack of notability. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As indicated above by
WP:TOOSOON I will have to accept that. Stil has indicated that he intends to take part in the 2017 World Championships, which is of course already more noteable in itself, and hopefully that will get some more media attention which might make it possible to recreate the page then.Belfastchild1974 (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
- Another alternative to deletion or a redirect
  WP:AFC so that reviewers can assess it and provide suggestions on ways to improve it if necessary. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:40, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  Thank you for that suggestion,
  WP:TOOSOON. Is there anything I need to do to make that happen rather than deletion of the page? Belfastchild1974 (talk) 22:58, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  Userfication may be possible as long as
  WP:USERFY#NO does not apply. The closing admin will assess the comments made here and determine if a consensus has been established either way. As long as there are no strong opposes to the idea, I think it should be OK. The only thing to do is wait until this AfD discussion is closed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or userfy. No arguments have been presented that suggest this person meets
WP:NSPORT, and the sources in the article do not support GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.