Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punknews.org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 05:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Punknews.org

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:RS with only one time mentions --Eng. M.Bandara-Talk 01:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I did find this article from Billboard. --Michig (talk) 06:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:47, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:47, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only one
WP:RS article significantly about this news site, instead of quoting it or passing mentions. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Weak.Appears to fail
WP:WEBCRIT 1 and 2. L3X1 (distænt write) 13:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.