Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qatar–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:23, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is very clearly a

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a CFORK; the
  π, ν) 17:45, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep sufficient enough coverage as a separate topic. I wish to add, Qatar's diplomatic crisis involves other countries as well, this topic is specifically about Qatar and Saudi Arabia.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 01:37, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Does appear to be a
  synthesis is not a factor. There are 86 references and I did not run across anything to do with any "proxy" that would be what, a Proxy war? . Even the use of the word, apparently just taken at face value, is confusing and I don't see a "proxy conflict" either. Equally confusing is the above statement, "this topic is specifically about Qatar and Saudi Arabia". The article does not indicate this nor the sources provided that include a multitude of countries. Otr500 (talk) 00:56, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. Of course to leave. What can we talk about here? The significance is obvious, the sources too. -Victoria III (talk) 23:16, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The conflict between the two states is highly significant to the Syrian civil war, and the article should be edited as to reflect as such, not deleted. Plumber (talk) 01:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

— Note to closing admin:

• Which is why we already have
  2017–18 Qatar diplomatic crisis for you to edit. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 04:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• This article is about a proxy conflict between Qatar and the KSA which largely intensified since the Arab Spring began in 2011, especially after protests in Bahrain. Otr500 is right that the article should perhaps be renamed; perhaps the Second Arab Cold War? Since your comment, the article has been revised to better reflect its scope, though there is always room for improvement. There is information from other Arab Spring pages (Al Nusra, Libyan Civil War, Syrian Civil War), which would probably be better on this article (especially since many of those articles are too long and convoluted), but the response should be to further edit the article. To delete this page entirely would strike at the heart of
  NPOV. Plumber (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• This conflict you speak of (the one that "largely intensified since the Arab Spring began in 2011") is hardly even notable to warrant a standalone article. And we
  how many reliable sources (if any) refer to this supposed proxy conflict as a "Second Arab Cold War"? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 05:47, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• The article perhaps should be retitled to include the de facto Saudi / UAE alliance, which does exist in Libya.[1] Reliable sources regularly indicate the UAE plays the junior role to the Saudis within the GCC. Indeed, the lack of a COMMONNAME is why the article is titled so. I still see no reason why the article should be deleted — the rivalry of Qatar and Saudi Arabia in Syria in particular is a major reason why Assad was able to hold out during 2013, and the resulting repercussions have vastly affected the Middle East, the European Union, Russia, and the United States. This article is far more significant than article on the 2017-2018 Qatar crisis, and I was highly surprised it did not exist until recently. Plumber (talk) 06:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.