User talk:Plumber

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have reverted two times in the last handful of hours. If you revert an additional time, you'll have hit 3RR. I would advise you not to do this. Toa Nidhiki05 05:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you yourself noted in your edit summary, other editors have removed your addition to the article. I have also removed the addition as it is questionable whether it is due for inclusion. Under

Thank you, we appear to have achieved consensus using an article from The Hill. --Plumber (talk) 08:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit war over your addition. The map that you added is clearly unsourced and your attempt to add some bibliography to it after it was challenged won't change that or the fact that we don't need to resort to

You are the one engaging in an edit war. The bibliography was assembled by the creator of the map. This map is more well-designed and sourced than the others on the page and its addition to the page enlightens. This behavior of yours is highly irregular for a sysop. Plumber (talk) 20:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Satō–Kishi–Abe family. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how an article about the family of three Japanese Prime Ministers is not notable per

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electoral history of Donald Trump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reform Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1844 United States presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2004 United States Senate election in South Dakota, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Lucas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Ba'athist Syria. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. EoRdE6^(Talk) 03:34, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plumber! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Armed factions in the Syrian civil war several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Armed factions in the Syrian civil war, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 05:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inuit Nunangat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenlandic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Ankit Jain.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the

Could you add the url to the Ballotpedia page where you found this image to the file's description? Without an actual URL, it's hard to verify that the file you've uploaded is actually released under a {{

cc-by-sa-4.0}}, and the file can't be kept without having some way of verifying that license. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:11, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

You're welcome to join the discussion about this file at

WP:MCQ#Ballotpedia as a source for images. In fact, it would help sort things out if you could clarify why you think this photo has been released under a "cc-by-sa-4.0" license. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:19, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

A tag has been placed on

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Ирука¹³ 16:36, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1978 Iranian politics, a topic designated as

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the

administrators

have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable
  policies and guidelines
  ;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from
  gaming the system
  .

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

Cinderella157 (talk) 02:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions , when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cinderella157 (talk) 02:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply