Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quasi-elemental

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to

Elemental (Dungeons & Dragons). Possible meanings in chemistry may be handled by a disambiguation page or hatnote, or alternative redirects such as proposed by Mark viking. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Quasi-elemental

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 01:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 01:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to
Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 01:58, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge to
Elemental (Dungeons & Dragons), which has a section on this topic. If, in the future, it is expanded with additional material and citations, it can be broken back out into a freestanding article. bd2412 T 02:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Merge to
Aoba47 (talk) 23:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment: A merge seems appropriate, but I wonder whether this page should instead redirect to something chemistry related; there are a number of hits on Google Scholar. I know nothing about the subject; I'll leave a quick note on the WikiProject Chemistry talk page. Josh Milburn (talk) 04:36, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I haven't found quite enough sourcing for independent notability, but the basic facts are verifiable and there is an appropriate merge target, so per
WP:ATD a merge is preferable to deletion. The merge will require a redirect to preserve attribution. Regarding JM's point, there is a substance called quasi-elemental carbon in the literature that is mostly elemental carbon with a little organic content (I think). No prejudice to creating such a quasi elemental carbon or quasi elemental (chemistry) article or redirect in the future. --Mark viking (talk) 15:27, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge and redirect per BD2412, above.Vulcan's Forge (talk) 17:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.