Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STANAG 4222

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

STANAG 4222

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I haven't found many sources talking about this, probably because it is so specialized. This is essentially a very technical standards for a very narrow field. Ego White Tray (talk) 19:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment STANAG 1236 and STANAG 1472 seems similar articles. Perhaps there is a list of STANAG standards to move these all into? Ego White Tray (talk) 20:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Dictionary definition. Article without content. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete or redirect to
STANAG redirect is probably good enough for searching purposes. --Mark viking (talk) 21:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete as per nom. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.