Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabor (Tarzan)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tarzan. I find a clear consensus based on policy-based rationales, to not sustain this as a standalone article. Varying views as to whether a merge is the right option or not, so rather than formalising a set action by closing as 'merge', closing as 'redirect' and normal editorial process can rescue content from behind the redirect and incorporate into the main article if there is a desire to do so. Daniel (talk) 00:46, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sabor (Tarzan)

Sabor (Tarzan) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable fictional character, no sources found in

WP:BEFORE, article is almost entirely unsourced. (Oinkers42) (talk) 00:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. (Oinkers42) (talk) 01:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. (Oinkers42) (talk) 01:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions. (Oinkers42) (talk) 01:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. (Oinkers42) (talk) 01:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose deletion. Though I would, wouldn't I, having originated the article. Unnotability is debatable, and plainly a matter of opinion. Claim that article is almost entirely unsourced is false on its face; five sources listed in the references support points made in the text. Other points do remain unreferenced, and for these sources would certainly be useful. But while one can debate the sufficiency, quality or suitability of the sources, the claim as made is simply wrong. BPK (talk) 04:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, a google scholar search shows many academic sources referring to Sabor in Tarzan. Pikavoom (talk) 05:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Sigh. I looked at the and found nothing substantial several days before you posted. Did you even read my post just above yours? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:30, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Tarzan. If I understand the story correctly, Tarzan's dominance over Sabor is a key point in the Tarzan mythos, but most of what I find in a search for references is "in-universe" articles in Tarzan-related websites. We clearly need to mention Sabor, but without stronger referencing I'm reluctant to retain this separate article. RomanSpa (talk) 07:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Tarzan. The current sources are not substantial enough to keep this as a standalone article. TTN (talk) 00:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Tarzan: is not notable character. No reason to create a fan driven universe here at WP. Kolma8 (talk) 17:55, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Tarzan. No solid sources to incorporate into the article have been raised in this discussion (passing mentions in stuff on Google Scholar doesn't help), and sources on the article are either primary sources, or listicle-style articles with titles like "15 classic Disney film death scenes that destroyed your childhood", which doesn't seem like a very solid source. Waxworker (talk) 23:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.