Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharmin murder case

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

SSTflyer 10:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Sharmin murder case

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article about a crime has only one source. It may not be notable. Prod was declined because of Death Sentence. Death Sentences are not uncommon in Bangladesh. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yes, the article has only one source, but it's the BBC which, 23 years after the wife was murdered and 19 years after the husband was hanged, makes a 12-minute audio documentary on the case. Of course, other sources are only begging to be added, like this one: [1], an article from the Bangladesh Pratidin which ends with the following words: "বাংলাদেশের ইতিহাসে সবচেয়ে আলোচিত খুনের মামলা". Clearly notable. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 07:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What Biwom said. Peripatetic (talk) 14:28, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets
Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 19:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 04:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 04:07, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and I would've closed it myself, it seems enough for an article. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.