Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snak the Ripper (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Snak the Ripper

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been to AfD before, closed for no agreement. I can't find anything beyond hyper-local sources that would support keeping this. Not meeting general or musician notability guidelines. Also, no new sources have turned up since the last nomination for AfD. Oaktree b (talk) 02:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 02:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
keep (per last AfD), subject charted on the
WP:MUSICBIO. Mbdfar (talk) 02:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 04:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - GNG is met per my SA table made in the previous AfD, which took place just over 3 months prior to this. Such a quick re-nomination with no new substantive argument for deletion is disruptive and patrolling admins should consider a procedural close as such. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 15:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I can't say yay or nay at this point since I haven't investigated the subject's notability yet. This would be the third AfD this subject is facing with the first one receiving strong support for deletion, and the recreation closing with "no consensus". An allegation of COI was made here and it is worth a look. COI Noticeboard regarding Snak the Ripper. Edit history and the discussion will reveal two obvious edit accounts showing strong indication of advocacy and public relations editing activity. Graywalls (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I'm wondering what has changed in the past 3 months since the last AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:50, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm genuinely surprised this doesn't pass
WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 21:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.