Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul Planet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete.

WP:REFUND applies. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:55, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Soul Planet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don’t think this studio passed WP:ORG. Some of the people associated with were notable, but in itself it doesn’t seem to have been. Mccapra (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails
WP:GNG and currently has only primary sources cited. Needs more coverage.Burroughs'10 (talk) 18:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.