Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Emotron (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Hog Farm Talk 02:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Emotron

The Emotron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing has changed since the last AfD, which you could plausibly argue should have ended with a delete vote. The only sources I can find are the local music journals who write about any musician that plays their city. If this wasn't an established article that had already been thru AfD, I would consider this for speedy delete. I'm not redirecting to his former band Treephort, since it doesn't appear to be notable either. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 22:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 22:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -"A one man musical group...."?! Sorry but this just doesn't make any sense. Notwithstanding this contradiction, the refs are trivial, unreliable and not independent. Nothing here even gets close to
    WP:GNG.  Velella  Velella Talk   23:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
It's just an awkward way of saying one-man band Oiyarbepsy (talk) 23:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Just as unnotable as Treephort. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 15:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Shamelessly
    typical streaming entries. The article attempts to use the Austin Chronicle as a reliable source (ref #5) but all he got there was half a sentence about a charity single. The article's second paragraph says that he played with a bunch of notable acts, but those are cases of being on the same festival bill as them. No reliable coverage even in local sources after 20 years of hopping around local scenes on others' coattails. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.