Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Priest's Passion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Priest's Passion

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this was notable. Although it could redirect to Matthew Dewey, I think the title might be too ambiguous. Boleyn (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I could find hardly any sources. I am not opposed to a redirect to Matthew Dewey, but a Google search shows that it is not an unambiguous term. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 22:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no independent coverage. - Altenmann >talk 22:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.