Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TolMol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TolMol

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I agree with the nomination for speedy deletion under the

WP:WEB

guidelines. This article has been in "article space" since April 2008. I think that only indicates its longevity as a Wikipedia article. That "longevity as a Wikipedia article" is not relevant to the notability of its subject. All that said: I think an

WP:AfD discussion is a better place to address the issues about this article. Shirt58 (talk) 12:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

(talk) 13:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 22:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. Zero evidence for notability DGG ( talk ) 01:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails
WP:GNG Spiderone 09:43, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.