Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vancouver Adapted Music Society
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
]Vancouver Adapted Music Society
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vancouver Adapted Music Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
VAMS does great work, but this and this are the only articles I am able to find, and I don't think they constitute enough for WP:ORG or the GNG. Thoughts? Star Mississippi 18:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 18:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 18:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 18:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 18:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 18:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)]
- Mild keep There's a CBC article that pops up in Gnews, talking about one of the artists they've supported, so I think with the ref mentioned above it's just barely notable. Found a brief mention in GBooks here [[1]], page 238 I think it is. Oaktree b (talk) 00:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Gscholar also has a few hits in journals, one in Proquest in particular talks it about in details. Would seem to be notable. Oaktree b (talk) 00:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I can't see the preview of the book so wasn't sure how significant it was. Will go look for the ProQuest one you referenced. Star Mississippi 02:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 22:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:13, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.