Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Variety Tonight
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Variety Tonight
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Variety Tonight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Canada. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Subject most definitely does meet GNG; I was literally already in the middle of improving its sourcing before you nominated it, precisely because I noticed its lack of referencing in the process of agreeing with your prod on the related (but much less sourceable) Here Come the Seventies — so it now has twelve footnotes in it. Bearcat (talk) 22:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Hey, I remember this program. Yes, it meets WP:GNG. It does have some historic information. Articles does rely heavily on one source does include more valid sources - importantly, valid sources. I see no purpose to be served by axing this one. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 05:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)]
- Keep. Multiple reliable sources, meets WP:GNG. Contributor892z (talk) 17:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.