Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verbling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems like we have enough evidence and arguments for notability. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Verbling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was previously speedy deleted. It has been recreated by

WP:CORPSPAM written for promotional purposes. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

delete insufficient independent evidence of notability.
talk) 18:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep as missing international articles in Swedish, 2, 3, Spanish, Turkish. Will defer to other editors on removal of POV bios (Tnooz, Technapex, etc.) Burroughs'10 (talk) 12:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane ^talk 01:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- The fact that it is mentioned on some other sites is not sufficient. Can you comment on them? Are they major, reliable Swedish/Turkish newspapers or something? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- - Keep, answering the above question from Piotr. I've personally heard of
    Dagens Industri (link), Aftonbladet (link, founded 1830), Svenska Dagbladet (link, founded 1884), Hürriyet (listed as major newspaper of Turkey) Ferrari250 (talk) 00:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm fine with it at this point. I added the refs in places where machine translate could be fairly certain the ref was actually supporting the content. I left out Hürriyet, since it looks a bit click baity. TEN THINGS YOU NEVER KNEW YOU WANTED TO CLICK ON BUT DO!
TimothyJosephWood 19:28, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.