Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vince van Meer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Vince van Meer
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vince van Meer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Hello. Yet another Wikipedia article that follows a series of "pieces" in the likes of theodysseyonline.com (see
WP:BEFORE returns more of the same, such as kivodaily.com, which was blacklisted earlier this month. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 08:35, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the (T) 08:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I don’t see any RIS supporting this. Mccapra (talk) 05:25, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment something a bit odd happening with templates here today so apologies if I’m voting in something that’s just been closed. Per the main AfD page it appears open, but when I save my comment it shows as closed. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Delete this garbage — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C9F:F626:F4A8:280E:63E:4D86 (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Per the excellent analysis of the sources by the nominator. Another case where every single source that can be found in my searches is in the article already, so there are no significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Fails Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:31, 29 July 2019 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.