Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wherever We May Roam Tour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:42, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wherever We May Roam Tour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing suggests that this was notable as a tour. Newspaper clippings will probably prove that it happened; that's not in doubt. But there is no indication (in a book search, for instance) that this was in itself a notable thing; there is no in-depth discussion of this tour as a tour, and that's a requirement to pass the GNG. Drmies (talk) 04:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A band doing a world tour of 220+ dates isn't notable? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per lugnuts comment above even if the article is unsourced having 220+ tour date prove some nobility.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:43, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And it's one of the biggest bands on the planet playing for nearly 18 months too! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:V. Unscintillating (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What? That someone made up the tour? Now expanded with refs to show that it took place. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 20:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Access dates in 2007 and 2010? Anyway, that is only one sentence. Properly citing this article would be a labor of love that should have been done when the article was created. But not to deny your interest, I will change my !vote to Userfy if you so request. Unscintillating (talk) 21:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 13:25, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.