Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Union (Poland)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one "keep" does not address the reason for deletion. As soon as the organization is mentioned at Union of European Democrats, a redirect and if desired a history restoration to allow a selective merger is possible. Sandstein 14:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Young Union (Poland)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I'm concerned this association does not meet with notability criteria of notability. Additionally, Young Union has ended its partnership with the mother party Union of European Democrats, which is not mentioned in this article. Moreover, history section includes more information about the history of predecessor of Young Union, not YU itself. The more important reason for deleting this article that it does not prove any actions or occurrences or awards, social activities that would make Young Union enclyclopedic or notable youth political association. The Wolak (talk) 11:06, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. The Wolak (talk) 11:06, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Union of European Democrats. It can be mentioned there, but stand-alone notability doesn't to exist. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Normally I would say merge, but the history seems complicated--apparently it was not always a part of Union of European Democrats DGG ( talk ) 18:08, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But many of previous described youth wings weren't connected to the YU directyly. Those youth wiing were only ideological "ancestors" of young union but hadn't been bounded to them directly. The Wolak (talk) 19:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: clear as mud. More input would be wonderful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:34, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As with all organizations, the real question is not about predecessors or affiliations or whatever. The question here is: Is there significant coverage of this organization in reliable independent sources? The answer here is "no". What limited coverage exists about this organization is either not significant or not independent or both. Where the organizational complexity becomes important is in considering possible merge or redirect targets and none seems to be legitimately possible. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.