Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 November 20

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:ChreParkDogHill.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Zeroasterisk (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality, insufficent information to determine an encylopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Cockedhat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Beasley1951 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Cockleladder.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scoshi73 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unsure of any encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:CAOZ2T07.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FAB!AN (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Castle3pooface.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pileofwaste (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:08, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Currentlookc3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jbcubed3 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, unlikely to be PD-self as it is a screen shot of a webpage Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:C3logowiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jbcubed3 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, unlikely to be PD-self as this is a logo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Chinese.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Poopy17 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, sole contribution of user Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete looks to have a skewed height-to-width ratio 76.66.195.63 (talk) 05:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Comicone.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by R._New (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned image, unencyclopedic, may contain non-free screenshots Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Charleearm.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lumberzeus (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

Image:Carlisle_street_east_st_kilda_2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Biatch (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, photo does not depict anything remarkable - its a street corner on a commercial street Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Transferred to Commons - shows the unique architecture of the region. JRG (talk) 00:59, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Cdmcar.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrquizzo (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal self portrait Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Cza0694l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jonnymeldrum (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, does not appear to be the named subject comic -- not likely to be PD-self Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Fwg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mattwillers (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, likely used in a deleted band article Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Cover_copy_small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mattwillers (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, likely used in a deleted band article Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Take_Me_Higher (notify | contribs

).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Charlee2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lumberzeus (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Charterscreen1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gotfrank (notify | contribs).

Image:Charterscreen2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gotfrank (notify | contribs).

Image:Charterscreen3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gotfrank (notify | contribs).

Image:Charterscreen4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gotfrank (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, content is not usuable at current size, questionable PD-self license, not enought information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Caseyhallas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oblivion_phd (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, sole contribtuion of user, unencyclopedic personal photo, low quality Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:CDCCSG.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Klaatuprime (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, low quality, unencyclopedic Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Castle0012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Queenofthewilis (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, recently absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SchlossHohenschwangau.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by TGH1970 (talk • contribs) 09:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by TGH1970 (talk • contribs) 11:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Chris4.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherman90 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Commander_Elsier.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spacehead33 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, questionable PD-self license Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Yellow_arc_copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spacehead33 (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, questionable PD-self license Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:City_Hall_4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jirodrig (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, recently absent uploader, insufficent information to identiy the subject to allow for encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Cybele_and_Theo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ISAWaUFO (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Companyofficers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ichbinalj (notify | contribs).

• orphaned image, absent uploader, no information provided to make an encyclopedic use possible Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete. —

Image:B'z hollywoodrockwalk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jmaeshawn (notify | contribs).

• This is a picture of a current band and have been on a number of tours. Individuals should be able to take and release a free picture of them. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• That may be so, but this picture is showing a private event, where individuals were not allowed to attend. As such, no free image exists. This image is necessary in order to depict the B'z Hollywood Rock Walk event described on the B'z page. This is not simply a general picture of the band that anyone could take. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmaeshawn (talk • contribs) 09:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The "Rock Walk" event is not the main subject of the article, therefore, the use of the photograph is not essential as it can be replaced by any other photo.
  ^TalkQu 22:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

Image:ARRahman2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thatsineed (notify | contribs).

• No indication why this image is CC-3.0 Ricky81682 (talk) 07:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:BidenMurthaSNL.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HoboJones (notify | contribs).

• decorative image that does not explain anything from article TGH1970 (talk) 08:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:VirgilCantiniTapestryHillmanLibrary2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HoboJones (notify | contribs).

• does not qualify for Wikipedia Nonfree Content Criteria 8 and 3 (A: Minimal Usage). Image is copyrighted and isn't used in an article about that painting, but in an article with lots of other copyrighted paintings about a library. TGH1970 (talk) 08:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:VirgilCantiniHillmanLibraryGroundFloor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HoboJones (notify | contribs).

• Same thing as VirgilCantiniTapestryHillmanLibrary2.jpg above. TGH1970 (talk) 08:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Discussion closed; image is at Commons, not Wikipedia. —

Image:Zahi Hawass potrait.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kumpleanos (notify | contribs).

• Defamatory words edited into the background Socrates2008 (Talk) 09:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. BLP problem if this was used on an article due to background vandalism.
  ^TalkQu 23:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • NOTE - this image is at Commons and would have to be deleted there. I removed the IfD notice from the local image page.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:HadronColliderGeneric.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SCZenz (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, low quality. JaGa^talk 09:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Bonita in SD County map.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dcgomez (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, low quality, replaced by Image:San Diego County California Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Bonita Highlighted.svg. JaGa^talk 09:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:DmpTrck.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WikiDon (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, originally intended for Template:Truck-stub, replaced by Image:Sinnbild LKW.svg. JaGa^talk 09:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Optical trap.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Samir (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, replaced by Image:Optical trap.png. JaGa^talk 09:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete. —

Image:Dashaavataramlaunch-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Universal Hero (notify | contribs).

• There is no particular need for this image in the article. It is just a generic image of people during production of a film. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It shows the film in prodution. The artile is a possible GA. A keep shoul be proable there. Universal Hero (talk) 20:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Being a potential GA is not a NFC criteria and the use of NFC was listed as a problem in the GA review anyway. A photograph of the film in production is of only passing relevance when the main thrust of the article is the film itself. It adds nothing to the reader's understanding of the production section (e.g., it doesn't illustrate any of the points described). Fails on NFCC#8. Source of photograph has copyright statement "Copyright Notice: All images and content on this page are the property of SpiritofChennai.com Any reproduction or use including in print and web media in any form is strictly prohibited. In case you wish to get license this material contact [email protected]". Suggest you apply for a license at the listed email address.
  ^TalkQu 23:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:SalviaDivinorum.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hephaestos (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, we now have better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Salvia_divinorum Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Karlsruhe_Stadtwappen.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snoyes (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by Image:Coat of arms de-bw Karlsruhe.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as

Image:Minuteman_I_Computer_D-17.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RTC (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, credited at source to a private company, not the us govt. doesn't matter if the webmaster gave permission bc he's not the copyright holder. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Commons image showing through. -
  talk 14:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Ludwigshafen-wappen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snoyes (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by Image:Wappen Ludwigshafen.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Alderblossom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pollinator (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by higher-quality images such as Image:Tagalder8139.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:BambergDom.200px.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snoyes (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, better images are available http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:East_facade_of_Bamberg_Cathedral Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Cameroon_Provinces_Adamaoua_250px.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snoyes (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by image in category http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Location_of_provinces_in_Cameroon Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Also nominating Image:Cameroon Provinces Centre 250px.png, Image:Cameroon Provinces Est 250px.png, Image:Cameroon Provinces Littoral 250px.png, Image:Cameroon Provinces Nord 250px.png, Image:Cameroon Provinces Nord Extreme 250px.png, Image:Cameroon Provinces Nordouest 250px.png, Image:Cameroon Provinces Ouest 250px.png, Image:Cameroon Provinces Sud 250px.png, Image:Cameroon Provinces Sudouest 250px.png. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Kenya_Provinces_Central_250px.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snoyes (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by province locator map in http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Maps_of_Kenya Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Also nominating Image:Kenya Provinces Coast 250px.png, Image:Kenya Provinces Eastern 250px.png, Image:Kenya Provinces Nairobi 250px.png, Image:Kenya Provinces North East 250px.png, Image:Kenya Provinces Nyanza 250px.png, Image:Kenya Provinces Rift Valley 250px.png, Image:Kenya Provinces Western 250px.png. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:DRCongo_Provinces_Bandundu.250px.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snoyes (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by image in category http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Localization_maps_of_the_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Also nominating Image:DRCongo Provinces Bas-Congo.250px.png, Image:DRCongo Provinces Equateur.250px.png, Image:DRCongo Provinces Haut-Congo.250px.png, Image:DRCongo Provinces Kasai-Occidental.250px.png, Image:DRCongo Provinces Kasai-Oriental.250px.png, Image:DRCongo Provinces Katanga.250px.png, Image:DRCongo Provinces Kinshasa.250px.png, Image:DRCongo Provinces Maniema.250px.png, Image:DRCongo Provinces Nord-Kivu.250px.png, Image:DRCongo Provinces Sud-Kivu.250px.png, Image:DRCongo Provinces numbered.300px.png. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:21_Ribblehead_Station_Wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Npwjones (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, superseded by Image:Ribbleheadstation aug07 carlisleplatform.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Phinary.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AndrewKepert (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, don't know what this would be used to illustrate Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Presumably the Golden ratio base article. As it is, though, it's not a very useful illustration (if only due to the extreme aspect ratio), and it would not be difficult to recreate. So I'm neutral on this. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Brazil_Rio_Grande_do_Sul.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by Image:Brazil State RioGrandedoSul.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Norway-maple-leaves.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kdebisschop (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, we now have better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Acer_platanoides Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Eyckshuz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Craigor (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, not sure why we need this crop, can always be recropped if desired Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Evil_saltine (notify | contribs

).

• Orphaned, superseded by Image:Triangle with trigonometric proof of the law of cosines.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Propionic-acid.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shimmin (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by Image:Propionic acid chemical structure.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:AesopCargo1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mylifeisought (notify | contribs).

• Unused image of Aesop Rock Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:AesopCargo2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mylifeisought (notify | contribs).

• Unused image of Aesop Rock Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Afriendkatherinedotcom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Afriendkatherine (notify | contribs).

• Unused image for what seems to be a self published book Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:AfroasianbrothazZ.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Afro-Asianz (notify | contribs).

• Unused/orphaned image from an article that was CSD A7 on November 13, 2008 Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Aftermath cobver copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Absenceof3d (notify | contribs).

• Unused personal image Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Agp2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Collenestew (notify | contribs).

• Unused personal (?) image described as "look at bill in all his leather wear spanking this tranny. Bill is an Autogynephile" Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Agr.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Airzao (notify | contribs).

• Unused personal image. No description Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Ie1pnd1990.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Arwel_Parry (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, nonfree (despite gfdl tag), superseded by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Irish_pound_(reverse).png Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:New_Beetle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JeLuF (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, better beetle images available Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Triangles_with_equal_areas.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AxelBoldt (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, not sure what this could be used to illustrate Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Mobilic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nikola_Smolenski (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, no real source (that is to say, who painted this and when?) Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Heroin4.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Deejoe (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by Image:Heroin-2D-skeletal.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Commons image showing through. -
  talk 14:14, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Map_of_USA_Locator_Shenandoah.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lorax (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, does not specify author in violation of gfdl Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:De_saechsischeschweiz_coat.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by Image:Coat of arms of Sächsische.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Bialg.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hephaestos (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by images at Bialgebra Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Australasia_Mappa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Renato_Caniatti (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Lanterna_genova_vista_da_rina-wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Twice25 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, we now have better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Torre_della_Lanterna_di_Genova Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Deletion it's O.K. --「Twice²⁹ · contributions · talk」 00:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Cragside.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nommonomanac (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, superseded by http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Cragside2.JPG Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Tcourttube300.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Secretlondon (notify | contribs).

• smaller version of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Tcourttube.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Acrylonitrile.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ugen64 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by imagse now at Acrylonitrile Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Commons image showing through. -
  talk 14:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Ttfuzz_7.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Boffy_b (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Wheatear.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Seglea (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, we now have better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Oenanthe_oenanthe Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine to delete this, agreed we have better now. seglea (talk) 01:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Commons image showing through. -
  talk 14:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:FalseMorel.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hephaestos (notify | contribs).

• Low quality, no species ID (false morel can refer to several things) Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redundant crop of Image:Falsemorel.jpg. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Korea_bulguksa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kokiri (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, we now have better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Bulguksa Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Album cover.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Imadaqu93 (notify | contribs).

• Unused album cover. Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Bih Stan 1991.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:#Image:Bih Stan 1991.GIF listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).

• This map has been determined to be bad, because it was made from a bad source. For more information you can see the associated talk page of other such similar maps that have been deleted and where the current discussion is ongoing. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:Bih_1991.jpg (LAz17 (talk) 17:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

• Commons image showing through. -
  talk 14:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Andyhi18 (notify | contribs

).

• Redundant to
  gr 20:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Brazil_Para.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ahoerstemeier (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superseded by Image:Brazil State Para.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Contour-map-example.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Populus (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, not really needed (plenty of contour maps available) Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Canberra.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tiles (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Commons image showing through. -
  talk 14:17, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:A-Cup-of-Java.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alex756 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Mere_Addition_A.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Evercat (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• All these are superseded by Image:MereAddition.svg and Image:RepugnantConclusion.svg. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 16:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Mere_Addition_A_Plus.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Evercat (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Mere_Addition_Z.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Evercat (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Mere_Addition_B.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Evercat (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by

Image:Bad Gandersheim in Germany.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, superceded by standard locator map Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Also nominating Image:Balve in Germany.png, Image:Barth in Germany.png, Image:Bayreuth in Germany.png, Image:Bedburg in Germany.png, Image:Bothel in Germany.png, Image:Brandenburg in Germany.png, Image:Bückeburg in Germany.png, Image:Celle in Germany.png, Image:Clausthal-Zellerfeld in Germany.png, Image:Eisenhüttenstadt in Germany.png, Image:Emden in Germany.png, Image:Enger in Germany.png, Image:Erftstadt in Germany.png

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Keep. —

Image:Hornsbydockplatform.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JRG (notify | contribs).

• No source and permission for use on only on Wikipedia. Damiens.rf 22:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree, no source and no way of verifying copyright information.MrHarper (talk) 04:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and Speedy close - I am the author of this photo and I took it myself (as the photo says). The only proviso to using the photo was that the author's name be credited. It is NOT restricted to Wikipedia and the rationale never provided that. The author should assume good faith (which he frequently does not) - I can only feel the author is now targeting all photos I have uploaded to Wikipedia, and if he continues to do so I will report him. I have made the wording clearer. JRG (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since the uploader fixed the problems, this can be kept. --Damiens.rf 13:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There were no problems - the license never said it was just for Wikipedia. You could have cleared this up with a simple question to the uploader rather than assuming bad faith and nominating for deletion. You fail (as always) to assume good faith on behalf of the authors and you act disruptively. Why is that so hard for you to act in good faith?

talk) 03:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Please, edit with just one of your sockpuppets per deletion discussion. --Damiens.rf 07:55, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete. Might be acceptable in an article about the book itself, but lacks significance in an article about the author. —

Image:GordonChengSixSteps.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JRG (notify | contribs).

• Book cover for a non-notable book that is barely mentioned on the author's bio. Damiens.rf 22:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep - I invite users to read the fair use rationale for this picture. I believe it legitimately meets all NFCC criteria. Notability is not a criterion for keeping pictures (unlike articles), so this is not an argument - and consensus altogether has been to keep the article in question. As the subject of the article in which the picture is placed is an author, it is perfectly valid to have one (because that is all that is there) cover as illustrative of the types of works the author has writtenm and to have a book cover illustated as part of their work adds significantly to the article in a way that text could not do. The cover is very low resolution and is the only cover on the page (if more were uploaded I would have them deleted), and the cover does not financially disadvantage the publisher. As it is also the author's first work with his current position (which is now noted in the article) it is also a more significant book than any other book that could be illustrated on the page. I really don't know how this could possibly be deletable - I put a fair amount of work writing a fair use rationale and it has not been questioned until now.
  • Further comment - I must also complain that I think I am being unfairly targeted here. I recently decided to retire from this username (largely because of the nominator's behaviour towards me) - it is only because I have kept on checking pages I have watchlisted that I found out that a fair number of images I have uploaded while a user have been nominated for deletion. I believe this is more than a coincidence and may amount to bad faith on the part of the nominator. I ask that this be taken into account. JRG (talk) 04:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete being used for decoration and not to illustrate an article discussing the book in question. MilborneOne (talk) 19:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That guideline has nothing to do with what is happening here. It's not about the article discussing a book; it's an article discussing the author - and one book cover is a legitimate illustration of the author's work.

talk) 03:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

No, it's not. He's a writer, not a book-cover designer. --Damiens.rf 14:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then how are we meant to illustrate the author's work? Any of the books are copyright. One cover is a legitimate illustration of an author's work. It has been done elsewhere and no one has a problem with that. I think this just goes to show you are targeting my uploads. If you have a problem with me then say something, don't hide behind your deletions. You are being far too dogmatic about a picture which is used legitimately here and which has a genuine and proper rationale for usage. Again I invite the closing moderator to please read the rationale.

talk) 21:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: keep -

Image:Atlas_New_York.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ThreeOneFive (notify | contribs).

• No freedom of panorama for statues in the US and sculptor died in 1963, thus this is a non-free derivative.
  chat} 00:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Comment: I think that it should be presumed still protected until investigation shows otherwise; but, unfortunately, DoD of the artists doesn't tell us whether the work is still under copyright, American law having been, uhm, unfortunate until late in the 20th Century, with some persisting hang-over into the present. The fact that this work was produced in 1936 increases the chances that it is still under copyright (had it been produced before 1923, its copyright would now be unrecognized by law, regardless of DoD); but if copyrights were not renewed at least twice, then this work is PD. —SlamDiego_←T 06:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdrawn. Further research by Commons folks on another image of this statue has determined that it was never registered for copyright or "published" (i.e., installed) with a copyright notice.
  chat} 21:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]