Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 June 24

< June 23	June 25 >

June 24

File:View from Maternity Unit, Mengo Hospital.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Author name given, but use non-disclosure license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 04:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SMS V187at Heligoland.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

No reliable source, sourced only to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:SMS V 187.jpg appears to be the origin file.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Generla boyadziev s shtaba na 1va armija.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poor source, Date is not of original publication Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Galloping major sheet music 01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep and change to {{

PD-1923-abroad}}. Deryck C. 11:42, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Can't be an old PD and a Self. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is clearly a copyright notice but MCMVI means 1906, so the copyright has already expired as {{
PD-1923-abroad}}.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sunshine of your smile sheet music 01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: resolved czar 16:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can't be both licenses, Choose one. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is that brown corner effect because the paper was folded during the photographing? In that case, one may want to add a {{
PD-1923-abroad}} (the copyright notice says the work is from 1915, which I am inclined to take as the publication year when it's part of a copyright notice) as a safety measure.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:46, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
- {{
  PD-US-1923-abroad
  }} suggests to me that the uploader himself published the paper before 1923. This sounds wrong to me.

I wouldn't drop any copyright tags as the picture might be copyrighted as a photographic image in some countries. --

Stefan2 (talk) 22:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kirkby and hudson sheet music 02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: resolved czar 16:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can't be both licenses, Choose one. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It can be both licenses, when more than one copyright is involved - the publication's copyright and the photographer's. In this case,

{{photo of art|{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0|migration=redundant}}||
{{PD-US-1923-abroad|pdsource=yes}}{{PD-UK|local}}|pdsource=yes}}

considering that the image was apparently published in 1922 (see [1]). Assuming that the music sheet was indeed anonymous, that is. A {{

PD-Art}} template can also work but including a free license by the photographer is safer for reusers.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kirkby and hudson sheet music 01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: resolved czar 16:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can't be both licenses, choose one. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have {{
PD-1923-abroad}} (the copyright notice says the work is from 1921, which I am inclined to take as the publication year when it's part of a copyright notice).Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

We should create something like {{
Stefan2 (talk) 22:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SAARC2 1.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete as superseded. Deryck C. 11:47, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map, unclear what it is used for, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 10:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notified the uploader, maybe they know.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:15, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Uploaded for South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (next edit in uploader's few contributions), appears to have been superseded by Image:SAARC3.svg. ★ Bigr Tex 21:43, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mangasarian, Mangasar Magurditch trut-59751.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This would seem to be a modern cover. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UWSoM logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Deryck C. 11:49, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo, low res, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 10:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notified uploader.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iphone Cases by Eagletech.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete as spam. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously bogus public domain claim. Whpq (talk) 14:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:McGraw Hill Education Logo India.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F5 by Ronhjones (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

This is only text and colour and can certainly be relicensed as PD-USOnly. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo Aden Fulfillment.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to pd-textlogo czar 16:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a case for PD-USOnly, unless that kind of logo is not copyrightable in Thailand (the presumable country of origin) Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I got a full usage permission from the company itself actually for this article. I asked them since the article would feel bare without it. They're a pretty big thing now here in Manila actually, especially for retail companies looking for outsource. :) RepublicaNegrense (talk) 01:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2016-05-06 1357 home of Judge Edward William Cornelius Humphrey and Jessamine Barclay in Louisville Kentucky.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete: insufficient sourcing for image copyright; giving seven days to reuse as fair use as a courtesy czar 17:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image; doesn't appear to be useful. No articles on these subjects. No source or even year of creation, so licensing is questionable as well. ~ Rob^Talk 19:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend that the file be retained, DO NOT DELETE, possibly move to Wikimedia Commons. I will be happy to provide additional information if my initial upload of the file was incomplete in its information. I probably intended this file for the page on Edward William Cornelius Humphrey which was deleted after lengthy discussion. I still think the page should not have been deleted. Even if the intended page is not restored, there remain other people in Wikipedia who also lived in this house, and the image could be used on their pages. Thank you for calling this to my attention.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:32, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitzi.humphrey: At the very least, we need information on the source of this photograph. The claimed license is "life + 100", but this is not provable given no information on who the author is. ~ Rob^Talk 00:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that any living person knows who photographed this picture. It is obviously quite old (note the horse-drawn sleigh and the top hat). This file was captured by me from one that I have had in my ancestry files for years. I think it came to me via Ancestry.com from a cousin of my husband . . . I'm not sure which of us posted it first. Lewis Craig Humphrey or Edward Porter Humphrey or Eleanor Silliman Belknap Humphrey would probably know the answer if they were living. The Filson Historical Society in Louisville may be able to solve the mystery. I think the house shown in the file may have been one of the buildings donated as a site for either the Filson Club or the Pendennis Club.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 15:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitzi.humphrey: I see two arrow watermarks on the image, like you screenshotted it from a slide presentation. Where does the image actually come from? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jo-Jo Eumerus and Rob, You are correct that I probably took this photo from a slide show of my own Picasa photo files or from other versions of photo software or other personal uses of the photo in my ancestry files. Judge Edward William Cornelius Humphrey (also known as E.W.C. Humphrey or "Alphabet" Humphrey) was the original destination article for which the image file was intended to be used. Since that article was deleted against my expressed wishes in the deletion discussion, I would like now to use it in the article Edward Porter Humphrey. E.W.C. Humphrey was the son and first child of the Rev. Dr. Edward Porter Humphrey, co-founder of Cave Hill Cemetery and his first wife Catherine Cornelia Prather Humphrey, who, along with her infant second child died in childbirth. They were ancestors of newspaper editor Lewis Craig Humphrey, whose wife was Eleanor Silliman Belknap Humphrey. There should be no objection to free use in the public domain of the image now. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 17:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It should also be noted that Edward William Cornelius Humphrey was the half-brother of Alexander Pope Humphrey.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 17:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you know anything about how old the picture and the underlying plaque are, as well as publication dates for either? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Having read through all of this, I still think the licensing is strongly questionable. You state this is in the public domain, but we're just judging the year by the horses and top hats in the picture. Top hats were fashionable until the mid 20th century, well after 1916, which is the latest date this picture could have been taken for this license to be accurate.
horse and buggies were in popular use until the 1920s, also after this date. We can't assume that 100 + life (or even the 1923 cutoff for PD in the United States) applies here without sourcing to that effect. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The photograph appears to have no underlying plaque, just an antique frame which probably had either a cardboard, wood, or paper backing and could have been added later. The dates of the couple who owned the house in the photograph were . . . Jessamine Barclay (sometimes spelled Barckly or Barkley): 1846-1905 and Edward William Cornelius Humphrey: 1844-1917.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 17:57, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arthur At Desk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo uploaded in 2005 of an editor inactive since 2007. No longer useful. ~ Rob^Talk 20:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The photo is in use on the editor's user page. ★ Bigr Tex 21:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arboretum1psu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image; unlikely to ever be used. ~ Rob^Talk 20:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Viewmtnit.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image; unlikely to ever be used. ~ Rob^Talk 21:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Golf1f05.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image; unlikely to ever be used. ~ Rob^Talk 21:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ariel la troya.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep czar 16:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of unidentified man; no encyclopedic value. ~ Rob^Talk 21:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like it is Ariel (DJ) based on filename and edit history of the uploader.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brandshatch.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and obsolete to File:Brands Hatch.svg ~ Rob^Talk 21:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Currently in use on two user pages. ★ Bigr Tex 21:59, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arpad speaks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic value over File:Nte-kir-arpad.jpg. ~ Rob^Talk 22:56, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to deletion István 16:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Christina.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Questionable licensing, as the user who uploaded it is named MikeEntner but the photo is credited to Dylan Entner. Out of focus. ~ Rob^Talk 23:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Criddy.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image for article that was never created. See Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/2007-08-01#Christopher_Aquino. No encyclopedic value. ~ Rob^Talk 23:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David coats.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unencyclopedic personal image. ~ Rob^Talk 23:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dean George Catlett.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unencyclopedic personal image. ~ Rob^Talk 23:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DEMENTED PIC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unencyclopedic personal image. ~ Rob^Talk 23:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eb-head3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image taken by uploader's wife according to the summary. No valid license. ~ Rob^Talk 23:11, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flarn2005-Photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 22:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flarn2006 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Wikipedia:Child protection. Pictures of editors who are underage should not be hosted on the project for obvious reasons. ~ Rob^Talk 23:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to their userpage, they should no longer be underage right now.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
While it's true that I'm no longer underage (so that isn't an issue), I don't use that photo anymore, so feel free to delete it. Also, my username is different because I had it changed. flarn2006 [
t c] time: 03:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The old revision needs to be deleted unless we get permission from the uploader's orthodontist. It's also questionable whether the uploader took the current revision. --
Stefan2 (talk) 23:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flarn2005-drawn.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: derivative of deleted image czar 16:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_June_24#File:Flarn2005-Photo.jpg. WP:Child protection. ~ Rob^Talk 23:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Denver rockets.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free, historic, National Basketball Association logo being used decoratively (without any critical commentary about the logo in the article) in

WP:NFCCP#8. ★ Bigr Tex 23:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Denver Nuggets 2003-2008.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free, historic, National Basketball Association logo being used decoratively (without any referenced critical commentary about the logo, and that only in the caption) in

WP:NFCCP#8. This logo is a variation of the one in the infobox, and thus adds little to the reader's understanding. ★ Bigr Tex 23:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Denvernuggets.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free, historic, National Basketball Association logo being used decoratively (without any critical commentary about the logo in the article) in

WP:NFCCP#8. ★ Bigr Tex 23:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.