Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 7

< February 6	February 8 >

February 7

File:F13-game.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to the folks on Commons, this isn't a copyrightable logo seeing as it's just stylized lettering. If we agree, the local version should be deleted as superfluous and a higher res version exists under this name at Commons. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Garbagemuseumlogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The license of the Commons file commons:File:Garbagemuseumlogo.png is most likely incorrect, but as it's only stylized lettering I have doubts that it'd be copyrightable. And if it isn't, the local version can be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Theresa May UK Home Office (cropped).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

G6 by PFHLai (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Is this file still needed? It's currently shadowing a slightly different file on Commons. Otherwise it should be moved to a different name. Or the Commons file overwritten with this one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted this one. The WCommons file with the same name is fine. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 10:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dimbokro Nzi River Bridge Red & White Tape.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder however the image appears to be cropped from http://www.timeslive.co.za/africa/2016/09/08/Bridge-collapse-halts-Ivory-Coast-Burkina-rail-traffic and is credited to "Sia KAMBOU / AFP" Whpq (talk) 13:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - Per nom.
Talk 22:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sub.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This vaguely named file consists of a more recent file with no source and no clear license or subject, and an older logo that is probably not correctly licensed. Most likely, the whole file should be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stahlhelm logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This logo exists on Commons under the same name. But beforehand, we'd need to figure out whether the logo is copyrighted - how old is it? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alternately, we need to figure out whether it meets the threshold of originality. It's tagged on commons as {{PD-shape}}, in which case it's intrinsically free (not copyrightable) regardless of age. But if it winds up being protectable and still under protection, it needs to be deleted off commons. DMacks (talk) 16:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as already on Commons. PD-simple is reasonable given commons:Commons:Threshold of originality#Germany czar 07:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dimbokro Nzi River Bridge Map.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder but this appears to be from https://www.bing.com/maps/ which can be seen by entering coords 06°38′13″N 04°42′22″W and zooming and panning the area. Whpq (talk) 13:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coupler Nigeria Link & Pin.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and pasted from http://www.vijesti.me/media/cache/e1/0e/e10edb3a0c4163917657c2f5f20c2fb9.jpg which is from a media site. Whpq (talk) 13:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DPC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a logo of a non-notable club, based on the deleted contributions of the uploader. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Silandro-Stemma.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file exists as a free file on Commons, but it's not clear whether the local file or the Commons file should be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sigiriya Rock.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file exists at higher resolution elsewhere on the web, so that I wonder if it was taken from somewhere else (and thus may not be a free image) Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Siemens VAI Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file exists at higher resolution on Commons. It may be uncopyrightable in Germany, a bit less certain of the US. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Westminster abbey west summer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisO~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Low resolution, only used in an ancient Featured Picture discussion. We have many higher-resolution alternatives at Commons:Category:West facade of the Westminster Abbey. Kelly ^hi! 14:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ro-map-ploesti.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisO~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Delete, unused PNG map. Kelly ^hi! 14:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Battle rocroi.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisO~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Delete, obsoleted by File:Battle rocroi.png. Kelly ^hi! 14:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rome outline map.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisO~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Delete - unused gif map. Kelly ^hi! 14:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:East London Line extension.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisO~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Delete - unused railway map. Kelly ^hi! 15:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:St. Mary's Church, Prittlewell.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, low resolution. Clearer photos available in Commons:Category:St Mary the Virgin's church, Prittlewell. Kelly ^hi! 16:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't object - I didn't have much in the way of a decent camera back then

Brit tv 16:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kempo Tomoe.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tag claims self created but source says "Internet", scaled-up duplicate of File:Kempo tomoe.png — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:St. Peter's Church, Thornaby-on-Tees.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, low resolution. Obsoleted by File:St. Peter's Church, Thornaby - geograph.org.uk - 79586.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 16:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Museum in Docklands Jan2005.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 16:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bendy Bus 12.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 16:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BartlettPark2004.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 16:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Three mills island.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 16:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wenlock2004a.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 16:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hampstead Road Camden Lock.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 16:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hamstead Road Lock.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 16:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:London Borough of Newham.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 16:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SS Robin Nov 2004.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 16:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Greenway East London.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 16:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:St Annes Limehouse1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear whether uploader is photographer. Kelly ^hi! 16:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stalker1992.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, nonfree. Kelly ^hi! 16:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Standardparadoxlogo copy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused logo. Kelly ^hi! 16:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aaron Sheehan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Although the Folger website says "images on this website that are under Folger copyright are licensed", an artist photo (or "head shot"), submitted by that artist to the Folger for use in their programs and publicity, is copyright by the person who took the photo, not the artist and certainly not the Folger. The license given here is invalid. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the photo can be found on Aaron's website, where the photographer is credited as Kevin Day (as are photos on other pages of the website). So Day has the copyright, not the Folger, and the Folger license cannot apply here. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (as uploader) and thanks to BlueMoonset for identifying the original photog DarjeelingTea (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HaysGalleria.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, low resolution. Clearer photos available in Commons:Category:Hay's Galleria. Kelly ^hi! 17:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stefan2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 17:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Steffiwiki.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 17:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Steffiwiki2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 17:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Steffiwiki3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 17:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stelios.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 17:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stevethepirate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-free film screenshot. Kelly ^hi! 17:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Americo Makk, Portrait of Jimmy Carter.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: refer to OTRS czar 07:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential portrait, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 20:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a well documented portrait of Jimmy Carter painted by Americo Makk (b1927-d2015) and commissioned by then Hawaii Governor Ariyoshi and not a "dubious self-work claim", as suggested, it was published in the Honolulu Star-Bulletin, (A Gannett Newspaper), Vol 68, No 326, Thursday November 22, 1979, "The Carter portrait, which is a "gift of state" from the people of Hawaii to the President, will be exhibited at the Governor's office at the State Capitol until February. At that time the Governor will present it to President Carter at the Governor's Conference." Photo of Governor Ariyashi by Warren R. Soll next to the portrait was published in the same article. Later, Americo Makk personally met with President Carter in Hawaii as published by Hawaii Kai Sun Press on February 17, 1982, "Portrait artist meets his subject" further discussing the gift of state from Governor Ariyoshi. See also DECOR, Magazine of Fine Arts and Decorative Arts April 1992. The photo, along with other photos of Americo Makk's portrait presented to Ronald Reagan in 1984, is being used in a current draft of the works of Americo Makk, a well recognized Hungarian-American artist, who died in 2015. Permission from owner of the copyright was sent to Wikipedia. These are photos from the 1950s through the 1980s and the permissions are much easier to get from the family (one source) from their archives rather than any other source from those years. There is no dubious intent of self-promotion in the photos or article, but intent to promoyte a notable and historical figure in the art community. Visit Brazil's cathedrals or the Vatican, Americo Makk's work can be found there.

I have no affiliation with Makk studios, any galleries or any other vendor that promotes or sells art. I do not personally sell art. My only contact was to get permission to write an article and get photos for my article on a subject that is of great interest and value.

Cstein99 (talk) 06:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC) Cstein99 (talk) 06:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Makks with Dr. Edward Teller, Senate Rotunda.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: refer to OTRS czar 07:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Every other file uploaded by this uploader states "used with permission from Makk family". Dubious self-work claim or missing evidence of permission. FASTILY 20:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission was requested from the Makk Studios and permission emailed to Wkipedia moments ago since they own the images and illustrate my article in current draft form on Americo Makk. This is not a dubious self-promotion but actually an article about a Hungarian American Artist, who died in 2015 with very rich history studied in Art Schools. Requesting the photos from the family is the most direct and best source in securing photos of work from the 1950s through the 1980's, and not indicative of dubious promotion of self-work.

I have no affiliation with Makk studios, any galleries or any other vendor that promotes or sells art. I do not personally sell art. My only contact was to get permission to write an article and get photos for my article on a subject that is of great interest and value. Notablky, it is very difficult if not impossible to write about anything concerning the visual arts without showing the depth of work through photos.

Cstein99 (talk) 06:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Virgin Killer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not a FFD matter. A violation of child pornography law is a matter for

WP:OFFICE (or User talk:Jalexander-WMF and User talk:Mdennis (WMF), as it were), and besides, this has been discussed at length as mentioned on File talk:Virgin Killer.jpg including this aspect. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

The file displays an indecent photograph of a child which is an offence in the United Kingdom. The offence creating provisions are:

Section 1 of the Protection of Children Act 1978 (PCA 1978); and
Section 160 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (CJA 1988)

This image may not be hosted in the United Kingdom or the entity responsible for their current distribution however the image is still accessible by those in the UK.

In US Federal Law It is illegal for an individual to knowingly use interactive computer services to display obscenity in a manner that makes it available to a minor less than 18 years of age (See 47 U.S.C. § 223(d) –Communications Decency Act of 1996, as amended by the PROTECT Act of 2003). The matter involving minors can be deemed obscene if it (i) depicts an image that is, or appears to be a minor engaged in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse and (ii) if the image lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

I argue that this image displays obscenity, that it depicts a minor involved in sadistic or masochistic abuse and that it lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. I further argue that the reasonable person would, applying contemporary adult community standards, finds that the matter depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way and that a reasonable person finds that the matter, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. This of course is not a court and thus I will not argue what a reasonable person considers to be… However, I will contend that this image is offensive and has no value to the Wikipedia project that is worth the potential cost of having it.

Talk 22:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep: Seriously, we have to go over this again? It is an incredibly well-known image that has never had legal action taken against it. It's clearly not a minor engaged in sexual conduct or sadism or anything; it's a nude child with a crack in a glass plate over her image. The costs of having it have been paid, and the value of articles actually showing an image of their subject, especially such an iconic and distinctly representational image, is huge.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@
Talk 22:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

I take it you didn't bother checking the usage of this file. As one of the pages it's used on, Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia, points out, it's been reported to the FBI. This press release is linked from that page wherein the Wikimedia Foundation's General Counsel, Mike Godwin, says “We have no reason to believe the article, or the image contained in the article, has been held to be illegal in any jurisdiction anywhere in the world,”. If it were illegal, then action would have been taken against it.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@
Talk 22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Oh, good, personal attacks. I could make some comments about the problems people have who look at the human body and consider it indecent.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep UK law doesnt apply in this instance on what is hosted in the US. The image is a cover of an album and is the only possible image of the cover for that particular album.
censorship even of things others find distasteful does not occur here. Amortias (T)(C) 22:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

@
Talk 23:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

There is stuff on this site, on commons and on other projects I am not particularly keen to have normalised in society but to have it removed from view or reduced to the degree that there is content removed because it may be found offensive does nothing but damage the encyclopaedic nature of the project. There is a

chilling effect on the discussion. Also commenting on a comment to keep an image with a comment of Do you like the image so much that you want it kept? isn't really helpful. Amortias (T)(C) 23:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep Nothing has changed since the prior FFD. As covered at
WP:IDONTLIKEIT after you strip away the rehashing of previously refuted arguments. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

@
Talk 23:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Despachos muchos foto.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. --

chi?

22:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Despacho final3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. --

chi?

22:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Despacho final1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. --

chi?

22:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vista ingreso.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. --

chi?

22:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Despacho final11.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. --

chi?

22:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Despacho final13.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. --

chi?

22:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Despacho final14.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. --

chi?

22:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vista ingreso blanco y negro.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. --

chi?

22:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fayzan Zahid in Office.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the image claims to own the copyright. --

chi?

22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fayzan Zahid in School.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the image claims to own the copyright. --

chi?

22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fayzan Zahid Playing Basket Ball.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the image claims to own the copyright. --

chi?

22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Recent Picture of Fayzan Zahid.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the image claims to own the copyright. --

chi?

22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fayzan Zahid working in Office.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the image claims to own the copyright. --

chi?

22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fayzan Zahid in his Bedroom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the image claims to own the copyright. --

chi?

22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fayzan Zahid.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the image claims to own the copyright. --

chi?

22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fayzan Zahid Childhood.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the image claims to own the copyright. --

chi?

22:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UNIVERSALEturks.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. While file is arguably ineligible for copyright, it's low resolution does not make it useful. --

chi?

22:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UNIVERSALSIXWPturks.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. While file is arguably ineligible for copyright, it's low resolution does not make it useful. --

chi?

22:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UNIVERSALSIXOOturks.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. While file is arguably ineligible for copyright, it's low resolution does not make it useful. --

chi?

22:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UNIVERSALTOOturks.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. While file is arguably ineligible for copyright, it's low resolution does not make it useful. --

chi?

22:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UNIVERSALEOOturks.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. While file is arguably ineligible for copyright, it's low resolution does not make it useful. --

chi?

22:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UNIVERSALSOOturks.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. While file is arguably ineligible for copyright, it's low resolution does not make it useful. --

chi?

22:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UNIVERSALWCturks.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. While file is arguably ineligible for copyright, it's low resolution does not make it useful. --

chi?

22:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UNIVERSALturks.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. While file is arguably ineligible for copyright, it's low resolution does not make it useful. --

chi?

22:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.