Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 27

< January 26	January 28 >

January 27

File:Growing Around Party Panic front cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Palettepony895 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Orphaned. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article deleted, per uploaders comments. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bulgarian25YearsOfPeople'sRuleRibbon.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in any article, identical quality article of a different filetype at File:Bulgarian25YearsOfPeople'sRuleRibbon.jpg on Commons which now fulfills the purpose this image once did. Both images uploaded by the same uploader, so the one used in the article is presumably the one they intended to use. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michael 5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be worth moving to Commons. Unused. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Irish Room Gasson Hall Stained Glass Boston College 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too blurry to be worth moving to Commons. Unused. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Quis Ut Deus3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Odd nomination. This is probably in scope at Commons in the sense that it's an entrance to a building of Boston College, which is notable, but we have no information on which building, so I struggle to justify moving this over. Thoughts? It shouldn't be kept locally, as it's unused. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art I Want To Live In A City Where... 2006 projections onto The National Gallery, London, Where No One Has to Be Afraid of Standing Outf.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art project MetaFenella 2014, interactive video portrait of British Carry On Actress Fenella Fielding.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art Complete Hero, 2009, As I Was Being Passed Out.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art I Want To Live In A City Where... 2006, No One Is Sent To War, National Gallery London.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. (See other images nominated here - URL is now dead, but assume it's the same case.) ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art All Men Are Dangerous 2006, Tate Britain.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art The Question Mark Inside 2008, I Don't Think This Is What God Intended, St Paul's Cathedral.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art project The Question Mark Inside 2008 projection onto St Paul's Cathedral, The Freedom to Love Who We Please.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art The Question Mark Inside 2008, think, St Paul's Cathedral.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art The Question Mark Inside 2008, breasts, St Paul's Cathedral.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art Power Is Always Temporary, Royal Opera House 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art It Ends Here 2014, Idiocy Walks With Wisdom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell public art Complete Hero 2009, War Is Always a Failure.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell Public Art Project It Ends Here - brutality - 2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell Public Art Project It Ends Here 2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Firrell Postcard Project 1998.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FirrellWhyThereIsWar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No specific version of the CC-BY-SA license chosen, so not a valid release. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FirrellWarIsFailure.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work, other uploads were taken directly from artist's website. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FirrellViolenceNeverWorks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work, other uploads were taken directly from artist's website. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FirrellGodIsAConcept.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work, other uploads were taken directly from artist's website. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FirrellGodIntended.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work, other uploads were taken directly from artist's website. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CompleteHero1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of a non-free work that wasn't permanently situated in the public, so not eligible for FOP. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MartinFirrellCompleteHero.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of non-free work, as above. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martinfirrellapologystpauls.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work, other uploads were taken directly from artist's website. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MartinfirrellMemory.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work, other uploads were taken directly from artist's website. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MartinfirrellTHINK.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work, other uploads were taken directly from artist's website. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MFlibertydies.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Dubious own work, other uploads were taken directly from artist's website. The artist's other work is all projected on 3D surfaces, so while this is mostly black, it's likely a 3D image and not eligible for PD-simple. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MFallmenaredangerous.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work, other uploads were taken directly from artist's website. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jldalailama.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work, uploader has other vios. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martinfirrellpolicestpauls.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Other uploads taken from artist's website. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brill Building Sony JPEG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Metropolitam Museum of Art Sony Small JPEG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pierrot Sony JPEG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LenoxLoungeSonyFlashJPEG-large.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Macy's Shop New York.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Late Show Ed Sullivan Theatre.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guggenheim Wikipedia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New York Public Library Wikipedia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cartier's Wikipedia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cartier's New York Wikipedia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carnegie Hall Wikipedia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Victoria and Albert 1 Simon Fieldhouse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:India Gate by Simon Fieldhouse JPEG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hitchcock l Bandstand - Geelong Simon Fieldhouse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dame Leonie Kramer Simon Fieldhouse 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Newington College Simon Fieldhouse 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kim Santow Simon Fieldhouse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:T S Eliot Simon Fieldhouse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Burnam Library Simon Fieldhouse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roderick Meagher.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Art Student's League New York Simon Fieldhouse small.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be artist, but OTRS verification necessary. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alexander-horn-sphere.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously never going to be used in the mainspace. Far superior image at File:Alexander horned sphere.png. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alice Cooper-Live-Wacken 2010.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Substantial non-free content in the background. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alex - 2012.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Never going to be useful for the project. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alligator pictogram.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of non-free content. The alligator is original enough to pass the threshold of originality. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AMDU badge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nachother (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Derivative of non-free content. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Android-logo-2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Available at higher quality at File:Android robot.svg. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Apache Sqoop logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Turns out this was a rendering error. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unable to be used due to low quality. Note the inaccuracies around the corners of some of the letters. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

it is used, and the official logo of the project from the source repo. svg can be scaled to any size. James Michael DuPont (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See User_talk:BU_Rob13#deletion (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 18:56, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lee-Bannon 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unencyclopedic. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nate Rowlan, wikipedian.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus for deletion Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep People should be allowed to post a picture of themselves on their own userpage, that makes communication easier. User:Orangemike User:GorillaWarfare (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 03:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:F9F-2-Wolk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Author claims permission, but doesn't have proof, and claims it is PD. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gary Marrow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bandit Kirkland, the dog.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:William Martin at NSC meeting with Ronald Reagan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very dubious self-work claim. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amir Ali Tayyab.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Justin brandon guitar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not used in any article, and unencyclopedic. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tracey Bell as Celine Dion.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status. The subject of the file hosts it on FLickr, but is attributing it to Artez Photography. Is this a work-for-hire, or just a (semi-famous) person who found an image of themself, and are using it? (t) Josve05a (c) 12:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ghidrah.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. First, I'll point out the most obvious: three keep arguments versus one delete argument (the nominator). The spelling on the English poster was changed. This is not a valid argument in the slightest in regards to

WP:FILMNFI

, particularly the second and third paragraphs:

"Non-free images used in film articles must meet Wikipedia's
acceptable uses for non-free images
, including two that are most relevant to WikiProject Film. Film and television screen shots are for critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television. Promotional material such as posters, programs, billboards, ads are also for critical commentary. Critical commentary and discussion of the film must come from
original research
from the editors themselves. Critical commentary should be embedded in the body of the film article. A non-free image can be used to illustrate the target element of the critical commentary only if it cannot adequately be substituted by a free equivalent image or descriptive text. The non-free image should be significant in increasing the readers' understanding of the topic. Non-free images can illustrate technical or thematic aspects of the film. Examples include, but are not limited to: production design, makeup, costume design, camera technique, visual effects, lighting, and iconic shots."

Deletion discussion venues are not decided by the number of keep and delete arguments, but by the strengths of its arguments in regards to policy. Not only did the keep arguments fail to address the nominator's concern, they completely disregarded both WikiProject guidelines and project-wide policy in doing so in this discussion and the ones below. ℯ xplicit 05:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough.

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify with this, these images are mostly promotional material related to the American version but there is no cited commentary or prose about what makes this image required to explain the differences in the films that is not already explained by prose. This goes for all the posters I mentioned with only a few exceptions. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is some significant commentary illustrated in the Release section of the article. It notes the American version's run time, that it was double billed with Harum Scarum, that Ghidorah masks were produced for promotional tie ins for the American release, and the section also notes the significant changes in the US version. Since the Release section makes various notes on the US cut and since the poster is already attached to the Release section, it would make sense to keep the poster. Armegon (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But that content is not related to the poster. Having the poster doesn't explain anything the text that doesn't. So this fails

WP:NFCI Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:58, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep The poster is evidence of the changed spelling of Ghidorah to Ghidrah. Alaney2k (talk) 21:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, we do not need an image to illustrate this. It's easily understood as prose. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zerogargantua.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The visual isn't really key. American film posters from this era often differ from their original country of productions counterparts, but it doesn't mean they are altered or not. The prose explains this, the image does not. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But it does not specifically do this.

Can you explain how it helps other than giving a visual identifier? The film is altered, but the image does not help show how this happens. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The poster illustrates the distributor name and the double-bill of the release. Alaney2k (talk) 23:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, something that is covered by prose and other sources. Image is not needed for this.Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Godzilladam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that the American versions of these films were what most Western viewers had seen, but it does not actually enhance the understanding of the content, nor is their any content in the prose (or from many of my research) on how the promotion of this material (specifically with this poster) is anything special. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article, the film is actually only had minor edits. I'm not sure how the poster explains what these edits are, the signifigance, or anything like that. Can you expand on that? Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of US version. Alaney2k (talk) 18:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

WP:USEFUL. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Revengeisland.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just by looking at the poster, could you tell the film was altered? You can not get anything other than it did not use the English title, which is already provided by prose and a copyrighted image does not enhance this in any way. I believe this argument fails

WP:FILMNFI as the inclusion of the image does not represent any critical commentary.Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was all unsourced, and the image does not illustrate the differences. Just by looking at the poster, could you tell the film was altered? You can not get anything other than it did not use the English title, which is already provided by prose and a copyrighted image does not enhance this in any way. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Poster is evidence of English title and double-bill Alaney2k (talk) 01:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But we already have superior sources, and we aren't supposed to use images as sources. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Godzillasmog.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Again poster illustrates English title and production. Alaney2k (talk) 01:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Godzillagigan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in critical discussion of English version. Alaney2k (talk) 18:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rodanusa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of English version of film. Alaney2k (talk) 18:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Varanusa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How does it give it a better idea? All the giant monster films from Japan were altered (some far more than others) when first released in the United States. This poster does not suggest how much/little of the film was edited. I mean, I wouldn't include the picture of the DVD that has the Japanese version of the film on the article to represent a home video release of different versions. It would be helpful, but the actual graphic doesn't help anyone without critical commentary, which does not require a poster. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What information is this that can not already be expressed as prose? Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of English version of film. Alaney2k (talk) 18:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How? (Also, see

WP:USEFUL)Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Humanvaporusa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of English version of film. Alaney2k (talk) 18:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mothrausa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of English version of film. Alaney2k (talk) 18:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Godzillathing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The poster does not explain any of this information and it's not unusal for films to have different versions outside their home production country. Other than illustrating the sections, they don't enchance the readers understanding of the prose, so that doesn't pass it's copyright info. Not to mention there is not much information regarding the American production. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:29, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But the image is not required to understand the changes, like a picture of an American actor/producer/anything would illustrate it better because it would relate to the text. The caption of the image in the article is also unsourced so it doesn't gain much weight in that area.Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:29, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of English version of film. Alaney2k (talk) 18:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can be explained without an image. Way too big for a non-free image anyway. Oversized film posters always end up being tagged for reduction to the standard size, which would be 439 x 227 Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Reduced image back to original. Point of issue seems to be that its oversized, so I returned it to the original smaller photo. Still say information about U.S title is better illustrated with an actual picture of the poster.Giantdevilfish (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gorathusa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of English version of film. Alaney2k (talk) 18:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kkvsg universal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of English version of film. Alaney2k (talk) 18:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Atragonusa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of English version of film. Alaney2k (talk) 18:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frankconquers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of English version of film. Alaney2k (talk) 18:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kingkongescp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of English version of film. Alaney2k (talk) 18:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yogusa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image appears to be decorative. Not used in the infobox, does not have any prose in the article to explain its use via critical commentary relating to the image. Appears to be decorative. User and I have discussed that this image should be representing the American version of the film which is different from the original release, but I do not think this image suggests this enough. 13:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Andrzejbanas (talk)

Keep. Image is used to represent altered English version of Foreign film for readers of the English Wikipedia. These Japanese films were all altered and edited for US release and these alterations (whether its removal of scenes, addition of new scenes, or simple dubbing) are mentioned in the articles. These posters give a visual of these altered versions to illustrate the sections in regards to the English release and will give readers of the English Wikipedia a better understanding and more familiar visual of the altered/modified English version of the films in question giving readers a visual for the version that is featured predominately in the Western market via TV airings or home video releases through the decades.Giantdevilfish (talk) 14:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think you said it yourself when you mentioned that they just illustrate the sections as they do not contain any specific information can not be described by text. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The English version section does have some significant information regarding the US version, which is altered from the Japanese original. The US poster is not decorative but helps to illustrate the US version of the film. Armegon (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The text in that section is unsourced and we require sourced critical commentary to balance out the poster. Currently we don't, and even if it was, this lacks commentary that requires the image to understand it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful in discussion of English version of film. Alaney2k (talk) 18:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rodan US.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Image uploaded does not have any critical commentary to back up the reasoning why we have it. Appears to be decorative. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Colorado-Rep-Joe-Rice.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted on Commons for lack of permission, see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sethant. —innotata 21:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:34time.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic image, unused in mainspace. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:44time.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic image, unused in mainspace. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hand movements for conducting in 2-4 time.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic image, unused in mainspace. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penrose hex.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic image, unused in mainspace. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penrose pent.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic image, unused in mainspace. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penrose rect.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic image, unused in mainspace. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penrose triangle (step 7).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, redundant to images already in-use at Penrose triangle. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penrose triangle (step 6).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Step-by-step images to drawing a Penrose triangle. Well outside scope. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penrose triangle (step 5).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Step-by-step images to drawing a Penrose triangle. Well outside scope. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penrose triangle (step 4).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Step-by-step images to drawing a Penrose triangle. Well outside scope. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penrose triangle (step 3).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Step-by-step images to drawing a Penrose triangle. Well outside scope. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penrose triangle (step 2).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Step-by-step images to drawing a Penrose triangle. Well outside scope. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Penrose triangle (step 1).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Step-by-step images to drawing a Penrose triangle. Well outside scope. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:911out.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic image uploaded by an editor with no mainspace contributions. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.