Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 June 22

< June 21	June 23 >

June 22

File:Academic (Main) Building.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as copyright violation, based on the uploader posting a different watermarked photo, on Wikimedia Commons: commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sourabhbit. —innotata 04:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of Largo, Florida.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 30. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:53, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Largo, Florida.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Les-Biches-ballet.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:53, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of a particular performance of the ballet

WP:NFCC#8. The image is not the subject of significant sourced commentary and is not integral to the understanding of the topic. Whpq (talk) 13:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep: I added it so that people could get an idea what the ballet looked like - rather important. Tim riley talk 13:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - image is essential to the article as per Tim riley above Jack1956 (talk) 15:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This image appears in an article about a ballet, and it is the *only* image in the article that actually illustrates a production of the ballet. The image is from a noteworthy production by
WP:NFCC#8, since it most "significantly increases readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep, per the above. This increases reader's understanding of the ballet. It is the only non-free image in the article, and the only image of the ballet. It passes NFCC8 as far as I can see. - SchroCat (talk) 13:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Real McCoy-Another Night.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of a music video. Fails

WP:NFCC#8 as there is no sifnificant sourced commentary about the music video and it's remocal would not be detrimental to the understanding of the topic of the article which is the song and not the music video. Whpq (talk) 13:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete: Does not satisfy
WP:NFCC#8, and the rationale is incomplete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:58, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Immreceived.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 30. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:54, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Immreceived.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Icvrayf.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 30. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:55, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Icvrayf.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bell Atlantic Logo 1997-2000.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to host this, fails

Verizon, whose logo is apparently this and is used in the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete: Does not satisfy
The use of historical logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the historical logo itself is described in the context of critical commentary about that historical logo. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bell Atlantic (logo) (1983-1997).gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KansasCity (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

No reason to host this, fails

Verizon, whose logo is apparently this and is used in the page. Nor is there any discussion of it (that I can see) in the page, as the rationale claims. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:29, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete: Does not satisfy
The use of historical logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the historical logo itself is described in the context of critical commentary about that historical logo. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.