Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 August 10

< August 9	August 11 >

August 10

File:Mere Paas Tum Ho.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 August 18. ✗plicit 00:04, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mere Paas Tum Ho.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Remove Child Before Folding Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim. Book cover is credited to a Robert Dorigo Jones, but the uploader's user page says his name is Andrew Parker. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:22, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mislabelled non-free file with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 15:06, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Renee Cipriano.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim due to small size and lack of metadata. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:06, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dot-Ninja.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The graphic element on the right may meet the threshold of originality. Logo is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The content of the associated article has long been deleted: .ninja -- SLV100 (talk) 18:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Algol68.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image that could be rendered using MediaWiki markup. All usages replaced. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 15:07, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Home of the Main Origins Discovery Characters.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image is a chart of where the main characters of a non-notable work live. Moving it to Wikimedia Commons would merely get it deleted there, as it has no clear educational use. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 20:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 15:08, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Noc listopadowa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image is an identical copy of one that has already been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 21:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 15:08, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NATO votes for Sweden and Finland.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unused map that was created for someone's fictional project. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 22:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Borderline
G3, the vote has not happened yet. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NATO votes for Sweden and Finland membership.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a map that was created for someone's fictional project. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 22:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 15:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brandy feat. Chris Brown - Put It Down.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not used to support critical commentary or per the rational of the section of music used is discussed in the article in relation to the song's lyrics, musical and vocal style, and may contain part of the song's chorus. which is listed on the sample's page. The portion of the song used is incorrect for this purpose and there is no supporting critical commentary. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 20:14, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is enough sourced critical commentary in the article to justify the sample's inclusion. Aspects (talk) 00:30, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The portion of the song which is included as the sample/upload is not the portion of the song discussed in critical commentary. A reliable source discussing the production i.e. "finger snaps" is not critical commentary- it is descriptive and doesn't satisfy
WP:NFCC. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 14:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I concur with nom, there is not enough sourced commentary to justify inclusion. Buffs (talk) 04:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing in the sample stands out to make itself subtle. Even with song article as sufficient "critical commentary", I don't see how deleting this file would affect what can be already understood. --George Ho (talk) 04:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HM Land Registry.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused logo replaced by vector version. Cloudbound (talk) 23:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 15:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.