Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 August 13

< August 12	August 14 >

August 13

File:Arkansas Monitor Launch.tif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accidently uploaded from image file AmericanButters (talk) 02:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chris Lee Craigslist photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fails

WP:NFCC8. Don't see how this increases the understanding of the topic. A shirtless photo is, well, a person not wearing a shirt in a photo. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

That wasn't the point of me uploading the image. It was to show the photo in question that is described by the text of the article. Zeddawg (talk) 04:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nepal 5 rupees Gyanendra.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not an own work. Copyrighted in home country as per c:Commons:CUR Nepal. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New Picture to replace old one on wikipedia entry on me.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:14, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 10:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New Zion BC, Organizing Site of the SCLC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 10:25, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tureaud Elementary School New Orleans.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 10:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NewHollandTractorHydrogen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work per uploader's talk page. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 10:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NickBrophy 12-2017.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused studio portrait, dubious self-work claim. File:Nick Brophy, 2017.jpg was claimed as own work but "Dustin Jack" is credited as the copyright holder. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 10:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nick symmonds after 07 prefontaine win.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a screengrab of a video. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 10:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Delayed Cord Clamping Calmness, 3 Hours Old.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work per uploader's talk page. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 10:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NIDIS Logo square.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superseded by File:NIDIS Logo square.svg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

delete uncontroversial. Buffs (talk) 18:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kidd marshmallows.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Packaging is above the threshold of originality. Image may or may not be fair use as the article already has several others. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Buffs (talk) 18:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fbi products.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:13, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Some of the packaging is above the threshold of originality. We need to determine whether the individual designs are de minimis. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:32, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep de minimis seems to clearly apply here only 2...MAYBE 3 packages have something that's copyrightable (and those are pretty small/incidental). The rest is clearly PD/uncopyrightable, though trademarks likely apply. Buffs (talk) 18:26, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.