Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 February 9

< February 8	February 10 >

February 9

File:Supremes-With-Love-From-Us-To-You.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Stifle (talk) 10:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually identical to the standard cover, so it fails

WP:NFCC#8. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tea tools 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Stifle (talk) 10:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source deleted as copyvio. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 04:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vassili Karis.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 10:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source is "Wikipedia"? Obviously invalid. Based on a Google search [1], image is likely a web scrape. Since license can't be proven, we have to assume it's non-free, so the image should be deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 12:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no proper source provided -- Whpq (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. This probably could've been tagged for speedy deletion per
WP:F9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Captain Obvious.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free collage stating the purpose is "It illustrates the famous mascot". There is a short mention that there was a conversion from claymation to CGI for the top characters but no other discussion about their appearance. The second character, Captain Obvious has no discussion about its appearance. All of the elements of this collage fail to meet

WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@Whpq:, there is multiple sentences about Captain Obvious, so maybe a fair use image of him alone would work. Sahaib (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of that requires an image of Captain obvious to understand. -- Whpq (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I might be willing to entertain a request to use a single image, but this is a blatant failure of NFCC#3a. Stifle (talk) 10:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RDR CREST.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 01:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo likely above the threshold of originality. No evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 04:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.