Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Footnote3" on Wikipedia
- certain wikipedian: Wikipedia:Footnote3/numlink2note.pl, explained at Wikipedia talk:Footnote3/numlink2note.pl Wikipedia:Footnote3/order-footnote.pl, explained...21 KB (2,739 words) - 15:50, 11 June 2023
- Wikipedia:Footnote3 and has been used successfully in a number of articles. I'd like to list here the experiences from this. Notes are needed even if...5 KB (831 words) - 22:36, 4 December 2006
- if automatic numbering systems improve in future. Please see Wikipedia:Footnote3 which includes design information which has been reused in this system...3 KB (437 words) - 17:39, 6 March 2024
- Also you might want to look at using a sysmtem for standard inline cites like Wikipedia:Footnote3 or Wikipedia:Footnote4--nixie 01:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)...905 bytes (146 words) - 18:18, 9 February 2008
- referencing should be used throughout try {{ref}} {{note}} or Wikipedia:Footnote3. You may get asked to add a war box, see it in use on Algerian Civil War...1 KB (203 words) - 13:44, 19 February 2008
- Also the inline external links are incorrectly displayed. See wikipedia:Footnote3 style and the India page for an example of its working. =Nichalp (Talk)=...6 KB (775 words) - 02:47, 20 March 2023
- see some inline citations, using whatever format you like, Wikipedia:Footnote3, and Template talk:Inote (invisible notes) are good ones. 2) There is...2 KB (251 words) - 16:54, 19 March 2006
- should be changed. This could do with references e.g. using Wikipedia:Footnote3 or invisible notes Mozzerati 21:28, August 11, 2005 (UTC) Marked to be...3 KB (374 words) - 17:29, 16 February 2008
- please consider adding inline references, for example in the style of Footnote3. It's good to be able to find out where information came from and how...2 KB (287 words) - 22:12, 16 February 2008
- incorporating the html links in text into a list of notes using Wikipedia:Footnote3. If you're worred about the length the section on counties that use STV...2 KB (365 words) - 19:11, 4 May 2009
- footnoting system should be used for inline refernces, see Wikipedia:Footnote3.--nixie 10:20, 10 August 2005 (UTC) We also need to check the accuracy...2 KB (405 words) - 03:37, 24 March 2009
- Wikipedia:Footnote3 had (including previewing and section editing), and this is what it's supposed to do. Even if I converted back to Footnote3, the recommended...6 KB (880 words) - 09:19, 4 February 2006
- Restrictions Management (DRM) b) could do with references, e.g. using Wikipedia:Footnote3, c) I think the section of source code is too long to have inline d) some...2 KB (342 words) - 14:51, 25 September 2021
- how to do that, I'm not sure how to use the same note twice. Wikipedia:Footnote3 should have more info about how to do that. VegaDark (talk) 19:27, 26...14 KB (1,435 words) - 13:25, 20 February 2023
- marked as such). Personaly I like using the style recomended at Wikipedia:Footnote3. Remember that citing your sources means others can verify the article...3 KB (403 words) - 16:55, 20 February 2008
- which are very bad style style. Ideally use footnotes instead. Wikipedia:Footnote3 is a style proposal, not a policy or even a real part of the Manual of...10 KB (1,601 words) - 12:29, 19 July 2011
- that helps, I'd still like to see some in-line references (see Wikipedia:Footnote3), especially in the sections such as Long-term impact and Aftershock and...3 KB (408 words) - 15:00, 21 August 2005
- later. Two alternative suggestions. There's a the new system at Wikipedia:Footnote3 provides automatic numbering with some limitations. It will probably be...3 KB (411 words) - 17:42, 25 October 2008
- again, Johntex\talk 14:00, 30 September 2005 (UTC) Check out Wikipedia:Footnote3. CDC (talk) 17:35, 30 September 2005 (UTC) A good company article should...4 KB (559 words) - 14:38, 25 September 2021
- the Mumbai page as to how facts are referenced through the Wikipedia: footnote3 style 4) I also feel that much of the geography should be under =demographics=...4 KB (558 words) - 01:24, 20 March 2023