Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 October 13

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

October 13

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 13, 2012

Template:BLP improvereferences

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_Zero 18:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No longer in use or used. Replaced with {{BLP sources}}. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 21:50, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • This hasn't really been replaced by {{
    Tikiwont (talk) 20:17, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Educations that have disestablished in 2008

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete.
Tikiwont (talk) 13:32, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

It is very unlikely that this redirect is necessary. People would probably not confuse this with "Educational institutions disestablished in 2008". It also has a grammar error in the title and is a mainspace redirect to a non-mainspace page which I am sure is not allowed. Thebirdlover (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agreed, delete. Unlikely grammar error. SpinningSpark 20:34, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, implausible. Siuenti (talk) 11:31, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this redirect as implausible. More generally, redirects from the main namespace to other namespaces are perfectly allowable and they're kept if they are useful. In most (but not all) cases there is a better target within the main namespace though. Thryduulf (talk) 13:07, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete slowly, since cross-namespace redirects to categories aren't necessarily a problem. This one is a problem, but only because it's not a likely search target. Nyttend (talk) 00:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spaceghostpurrp

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was created. Thryduulf (talk) 18:07, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting that the former title be unsalted and redirected now that this musician has an article substantiating his notability. Chubbles (talk) 18:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • The title is not and never has been salted, so I have gone ahead and created this as a redirect from other capitalisation. For future reference,
    Wikipedia:Requests for unprotection handles other requests for unprotection. Thryduulf (talk) 18:07, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gilon Majere

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to
Tikiwont (talk) 21:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

This redirect should be deleted because no character named "Gilon Majere" is mentioned on Dragonlance or List of Dragonlance characters. Neelix (talk) 17:46, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retargeting to List_of_Dragonlance_characters#Gilon_Majere would make most sense, then. Neelix (talk) 20:32, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Amtrak Joe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was wrong forum. Moving discussion to Wikipedia:Deletion review. Thryduulf (talk) 17:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Restore redirect. Article was twice deleted by the same admin, claiming it was an attack page. I believe that it isn't. The moniker has been used in numerous articles in a non-negative light.

p 16:03, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tanka prose

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 21:01, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This page was made into a redirect as the result of

talk • contribs
)

Comment - The AfD closer stated that the discussion was not resolved. There were no keep/merge/redirect votes that did not fundamentally disregard the issue at hand -- that nothing in the article merited preserving, because everything was either advertisement/unverifiable/gibberish, or already discussed in more detail elsewhere.
talk) 02:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
Comment This is the place to initiate discussion. You did not present any evidence that anything in the article merited keeping, and true consensus was ultimately not reached because you and two other editors essentially ignored the basic reasoning for the AfD.
talk) 02:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
Comment Please see the AfD closure summary. This was where I was directed to continue the discussion of whether this redirect merits existing -- no one made a legitimate case elsewhere for keeping the material in the former article, and the arguments presented at the AfD still stand.
talk) 02:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
Comment The is no relevant content, and I will be watching the
talk) 02:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Medebur language

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: This was originally nominated on 2 October, but the page was never tagged for deletion and the standard nomination template was not used (now added). There is an extensive history of one user trying to bypass process with this redirect so I feel it is particularly worth making sure we dot the 'i's and cross the 't's correctly. The extensive history also means there is an above-average chance that there are people watching the page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 15:43, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chain symbol

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to chain. Disambiguation is provided by a hatnote. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:13, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to an disambiguation page without any clear target. Redirect creates more problems then the red link it solves. The Banner talk 12:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mike Richman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Moot.
Tikiwont (talk) 19:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Copying Willdawg111's rationale from October 12 log: It is currently redirected to The Ultimate Fighter show. Mike Richman isn't even in the UFC now, he is a Bellator fighter. This redirect doesn't make any sense to be there. It should be removed, and since there is nothing writen for Mike Richman, it should be delted altogether.--Willdawg111 (talk) 01:08, 13 October 2012 (UTC) No vote. TimBentley (talk) 03:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:AWNIS

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Redirects created fixing pages created in or moved to an obviously incorrect namespace can be speedily deleted under crition
WP:CSD#G6. Thryduulf (talk) 09:47, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Cross-namespace redirect created when an AFC submission was moved accidentally to the wrong location. France3470 (talk) 02:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

XXL (2004 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete.
Tikiwont (talk) 13:34, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Should be deleted per

WP:REDLINK. France3470 (talk) 01:49, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_October_13&oldid=1078791769"