Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 17

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

January 17

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 17, 2018.

DONALD tump

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weird combination of typo and incorrect capitalization. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 22:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jessica(Merchant of Venice)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely redirect due to lack of space between title and disambiguator. Steel1943 (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, per Steel1943. PamD 10:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. The article existed at that name for some time so there may be external links to it that would break if deleted. Redirects are cheap, so I see no pressing need to delete it. --Xover (talk) 14:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom. Redirects are cheap but that's no reason to keep pointless ones.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Entries linking to this typo can be easily moved. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 23:38, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not worth keeping. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

DENR

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 25#DENR

World of Balance

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 25#World of Balance

GOAT Store

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus.
(non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Apparently, the subject of these redirects is a video game publisher, not the title of a video game itself. Given their current target, a list of video games, redirecting to their current target is misleading and confusing as the subject of the redirects not defined at the target. Steel1943 (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep all. The Goat Store is associated with homebrew Dreamcast publishing,[1][2] as is the subject of the target, and is mentioned in the article's list. (not
    ping}}) czar 19:23, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 06:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Omni-tool

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. While by a pure count of !votes we are split 2.5dab-2r-1del, the "retarget" !voters do not make any argument as to why "multitool" should be considered the primary target. As such, I close in favor of disambiguation, for want of a policy- or evidence-based argument to the contrary.
(Je vous invite à me parler) 17:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Overly vague sci-fi concept to redirect anywhere, should be left up to the search function. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that it would have to be mentioned in the article to be of any use, perhaps as a dab. There is coverage in news articles such as Venture Beat: [3] and Nerdist [4] but it still requires a mention in the Mass Effect article. The Some game has this article from Zam [5] AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've created a list of these entries. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Striking delete vote above. It looks like we have better redirect suggestions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 23:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not even mentioned in the target. It could have been speedily deleted I think. Domdeparis (talk) 17:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to multi-tool as a reasonable synonym. Stuff exists outside video games, you guys. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • "Omni", though? That implies that it can literally become any tool... which the one in Mass Effect can, but in real life is impossible. It is a science fiction concept.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:40, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this redirects to multitool then either Omnitool (disambiguation) should be created for the list of items or perhaps a section can be created in multi-tools article called Fictional multi-tools, although that could easily spam up the article. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 23:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC) updated 23:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify per AngusWOOF's search results. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify I don't think that multitool is more likely to be looked for when searching for omni tool than the artemis fowl one or others. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Krogan (Mass Effect series)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 25#Krogan (Mass Effect series)

Mario J. Lanza

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 20:08, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Originally this prodded as lacking notability, then changed to a redirect. However, he really doesn't have much to do with the show itself, he just writes fan fiction about it. ... discospinster talk 17:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Fan fiction author isn't notable for the show. Apparently, he is a Survivor fan writer / analyst who has written some books on the show along with Brad Wolgast, but none of them have notable work to meet
    WP:NAUTHOR. The main page doesn't have a listing of Further Reading where his name could go. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 23:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC) updated 01:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sanctuary Fortress

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 25#Sanctuary Fortress

California potato power

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 20:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Makes no sense and I have never heard about it in context of the game. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Boost Mode

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 24#Boost Mode

Quartet (Horse Racing Terminology)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Was previously an article which essentially duplicated

WP:NOTHOWTO. Implausible redirect with no incoming links, and no content worth merging across. (See also discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quinella (Horse Racing Terminology).) Kb.au (talk) 11:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikings-NSK

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE this is cleanup resulting from an AfD. The target was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikings (2nd nomination), so these redirects to the deleted topic no longer make sense. -- 70.52.11.217 (talk) 05:08, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tagged as G6 (seeing that you made the move with the intent to not leave behind a redirect) and R3. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 14:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:This is a poster for Prasad.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete under criterion
G7, since this discussion was created by the user who moved the file. —C.Fred (talk) 14:35, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Now a purposeless redirect with an absurd file name. --Kailash29792 (talk) 03:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another reason not to keep this redirect is
WP:R3. ----Kailash29792 (talk) 03:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shin Megami Tensei: Brand New Title

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Does not seem to be mentioned in the target page. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget - a search showed that it was an early title for
    Shin Megami Tensei 5. I imagine nobody changed the redirect target from the series article once the game article was created. It should be retargeted there. Sergecross73 msg me 04:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Retarget to
    06:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Moh Shuvuu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Minor monster not mentioned in the target page. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nocturne (PS2 game)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Misleading, as there is another game that is just called "Nocturne" that isn't on PS2. We also don't disambiguate games by system. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The nominator has proven that the redirect is not ambiguous, and I agree. Steel1943 (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep How is it misleading? The "(PS2 game)" makes the title not ambiguous, therefore it's not misleading. It's a valid search term. We also don't disambiguate games by system. applies to articles titles. I see nothing wrong with redirects including system names if it is a useful search disambiguator. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I agree with The1337gamer, I have no idea how it could be considered misleading.--Alexandra IDVtalk 19:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - per The1337gamer. The nomination would be valid proposal for an article title change, but not for deleting a redirect/search term. Sergecross73 msg me 17:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dante from the Devil May Cry series

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 25#Dante from the Devil May Cry series

Devil May Cry Series (video game)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Unopposed. -- Tavix (talk) 20:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Series" implies that it's not, in fact, a single video game.

Devil May Cry Series also exists, so a disambiguation is pointless. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.