Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 10

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

December 10

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 10, 2019.

Fielding Hurst

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 25#Fielding Hurst

Tiscali International Network

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 00:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear from

Tiscali) why this redirects here. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Tinet, which should be restored to this version [[1]]. Otherwise, there's too much history that will get lost, and it's too much info to merge into the GTT article. Here's sourcing for what happened: [[2]]. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 20:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 23:26, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep I don't know if it makes sense to restore
    WP:TNT! --BDD (talk) 17:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:21, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

John D. Kelly

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 25#John D. Kelly

The Gordon Infantry Brigade

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 27#The Gordon Infantry Brigade

Fackbook.com

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While this could be contrived as an example of typosquatting, it is not mentioned in the target article, and IMO is as likely to be an unintentional typo as it is an intentional search attempt for "fackbook.com". I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tim Petras

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. While {{not a ballot}} was indeed necessary here, the "delete" voters obviously have the more policy-based arguments in addition to the numerical majority. I do not currently see a need to salt, since the redirect was only ever created once. --BDD (talk) 15:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect violates Wikipedia's policy on Gender identity, which states that redirects of names pre-transition "should be kept as a re-direct if it is still a well-known name likely to be searched for by people unaware of the name change", which is not the case for Kim Petras, who was never famous under this name. source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Gender_identity#Common_name cave (talk) 18:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It has no encyclopedic value and should be changed.LoncharAleksandar (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC) — LoncharAleksandar (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Delete. Her former name is not mentioned in the article, and while it does appear in reliable sources (and on the Polish Wikipedia article about her), it never appears without the context of her current name. So it seems unlikely that this will be useful search term for anyone looking for the pop star. I don't think salting is needed unless this is recreated multiple times as there is a highschool athlete called Tim Petras who may become notable in the future. Thryduulf (talk) 11:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • The salt can be lifted once another person with that name has demonstrated notability and their article is written . Gleeanon409 (talk) 12:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as deadname, neutral on salting --DannyS712 (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Thryduulf. There are some cases in which redirects from
    deadnames can be useful, i.e. where the person in question was well-known under that name and the name is mentioned in the article; this is clearly not such a case. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Media coverage of Bernie Sanders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nom - wasn't aware of renaming proposals
- talk 21:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

This implies all media coverage was bias. ~~

- talk 12:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

కత్తెర తెగులు

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No affinity for Telugu Plantdrew (talk) 02:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: AngusWOOF seems to be disputing the rationale for deletion applies and it seems useful to get a clear answer to that question.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 10:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete per nom. The target is about a species with a worldwide distribution. Yes, it has apparently spread in recent years to Telugu-speaking Telangana, among many other places. No reason to have a redirect from the name in Telugu or any of the dozens of languages of the areas it's found in. – Uanfala (talk) 18:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don’t see the animal exiting in the region (one of many) as being culturally significant enough to warrant a foreign language redirect.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 23:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per
    WP:FORRED. 180.183.71.245 (talk) 03:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC) LTA troll NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:41, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Iman Elman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:39, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Elman Ali Ahmed, who does not seem to have been widely known as "Iman Elman", had a daughter, named "Iman Elman", who potentially measures up to GNG herself. I think it would be better for this to be a redlink, until an article on the young woman is ready for article space. Geo Swan (talk) 19:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 20:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 10:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shylock (2019 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 00:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a 2019 film, but 2020. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This was the title of the article from July 2019–November 2019, which tells me two things: 1) It was clear to the editors of the article that the film was to be released in 2019 or was a plausible-enough error to go undetected for that long. 2) There were several months for internal and external links to be established, and the redirect is currently keeping those links from being broken. The first helps those who may be using outdated sources that call it a 2019 film and the second helps those using the links established during this timeframe. Both of these things point towards keeping the redirect. If the redirect is incorrect, simply add {{
    R from incorrect title}} to categorize it likewise. -- Tavix (talk) 17:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Weak keep per Tavix. --BDD (talk) 18:04, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

PENTASA

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 20#PENTASA

Tiers disambiguation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term for disambiguation page DannyS712 (talk) 00:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_December_10&oldid=932691405"