Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 31

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Obiwan Kelnobi → Obi-Wan Kenobi  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The bizarrely misplaced l makes this misspelling far too implausible. —Xezbeth (talk) 21:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.
  Talk: Contribs) 04:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:32, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Not intended as a nomination per this edit In addition/response, I have placed a note on

WP:CFD discussion in case RfD participants can provide feedback for the incoming redirects.. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 22:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

I started a discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 January 31#Academic journal categories containing exclusively redirects that potentially affects a couple thousand cross-namespace redirects such as:

Canadian Open Arts Journal → Category:Canadian Research Publication academic journals

rather than nominating each rdr individually suggest the conversation take place over there. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  WP:G8. Steel1943 (talk) 21:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Actually G8 would apply here if the categories get deleted.

b} 21:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

@Headbomb: You are right. *figuratively slaps self on head*. Steel1943 (talk) 21:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which is precisely the reason I thought it best to provide a notification here at RfD. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@UnitedStatesian: I agree, so I placed a note on Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Last.FM upon CBS Interactive's due diligence → Last.fm#CBS Acquisition and redesign (2007–2009)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It's a redirect that doesn't make any sense, particularly given that nothing about due diligence is mentioned in Last.fm any more and hasn't been for about 5 years. I've already removed the incoming link from Growth–share_matrix "Six by nine. Forty two." (talk) 20:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.
  b} 02:00, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:33, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Page is now a disambiguation page. Inbound links being fixed.

(non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

• Dow Jones → Dow Jones & Company  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to

(non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

• 10th province of the kingdom of armenia → Republic of Artsakh  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No clue what this could be referring to. A Kingdom of Armenia and the Republic of Artsakh don't overlap chronologically, so at least I know that the current target is incorrect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Tavix: The unsourced Republic of Artsakh#Kingdom of Armenia claims that present-day Artsakh was part of the empire in antiquity. Dunno if that's too tenuous or not, but presumably that's the connection? ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• That led me to a bit more digging, and I found
  50th State), but I'm not sure what else it could be besides an arbitrary number. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Retarget to
  Artsakh (historic province) per Deryck Chan, works for me. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:38, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Retarget
  Artsakh (historic province) in light of the findings above. Deryck C. 18:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Actually, also move redirect to the correctly capitalized
    10th province of the Kingdom of Armenia. Deryck C. 10:48, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Journal → Sexually Transmitted Infections (journal)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. This is a mishmash of full name and acronym out of nowhere. Unlikely search term.

• Delete unlikely search term. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. There is adequate consensus to delete this redirect as to avoid confusion and due to the fact that the two journals are not one and the same. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Educational Research (journal) → Educational Researcher  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete because Educational Research ≠ Educational Researcher

• Delete per
  Talk: Contribs) 20:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. The redirect might cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete might be confusing to our readers --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]