Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 1

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

February 1

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 1, 2019.

Pazuzu (comics)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 15#Pazuzu (comics)

Joseph Pike

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:16, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This page has no links in any namespace. It should be deleted. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 23:19, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. There aren't any Wikipedia articles that mention any Joseph Pike. Deryck C. 14:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:List of infoboxes/Proposed/Infobox Mini blind

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 14:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect left behind after moved from a subpage of a now-inactive project page to another of the same. No links or substantive history. I propose it be deleted. Bsherr (talk) 23:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Falsche ISBN

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:FORRED since this redirect is in German. The redirect has transclusions, but they can be bypassed with its target. Steel1943 (talk) 23:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:List of infoboxes/History and Culture

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 14:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was created when a section of a now-deprecated list of infoboxes was renamed, resulting in the moving of this subpage and this redirect being left. Because that list was deprecated in 2008, this redirect targets the category instead. There are no substantive links. There is no substantive history. I propose it be deleted. Bsherr (talk) 22:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Louis-Alphonse (anthroponymy)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this set for deletion as a result of a discussion at the

these redirects are obscure and useless. -- Tavix (talk) 22:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Book:Jehovah's Witnesses

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn given @
(non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 11:42, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Misleading: Jehovah's Witnesses are not part of the LDS movement. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and repurpose. This book still covered Jehovah's Witnesses until September 2015, when for a reason I can't imagine, the contents were totally replaced with LDS contents. We need to split up the history and move the JW content back here while keeping the LDS content at the current title. I'm not doing that in the middle of a discussion, but if the discussion's closed as I'm proposing, I'll be happy to do the work if the closing admin notifies me. Nyttend (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Old list of infoboxes subpages

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are redirects created when these pages were deprecated. Specifically, a list of infobox templates was deprecated and later replaced with a new format at the same base page, and these subpages of the old list were redirected to the base page of the new list. These pages were deprecated and redirected by consensus in 2008. There are no substantive links to these subpages and no real historical or attributive value to preserving them. I propose they be deleted. --Bsherr (talk) 22:25, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Flow arts

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 12#Flow arts

Complete list of encyclopedia topics

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 12#Complete list of encyclopedia topics

Multiplayer game

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 10#Multiplayer game

12/31/2007

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects from days created at random are

talk) 15:13, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete all per costliness. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Telecommunications in Socotra

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 14:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are misleading redirects because the target article does not cover this subject. Someone wanting to know about (tele)communications in Socotra will not be satisfied by an article on Socotra in general. -- Tavix (talk) 15:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, the closest information I could find in the article was about an archbishop being excommunicated, which is unlikely what anyone searching this redirect would be looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 12:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Pres. Trump USA Travels

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump made trips to USA in 2017, 2018, 2019 (and likely in 2020).

talk) 15:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

. . .and in fact those other templates already exist, at Template:Pres. Trump USA Travels (2018), Template:Pres. Trump USA Travels (2019) So delete the one with no year. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a category for Template disambiguation pages, though it's small. --BDD (talk) 16:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. With no substantive links to this page, a disambiguation page isn't needed in this instance. --Bsherr (talk) 23:11, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Templates are the best way to make for easy editing to a great visual of where President Trump has visited. I created these templates and can tell you there is no better way. Deleting them would be a complete travesty. --User:Polly7423 (User talk:Polly7423) 1 February 1 2019 —Preceding undated comment added 01:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • We are only proposing to delete the redirect with no year specified, NOT the specific ones (and thanks for creating them). UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:22, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. --223.197.139.47 (talk) 06:47, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Template disambiguation pages are for when editors are likely to use a template name by accident (e.g. {{expand}}) because they don't remember that other templates might use the same name. Not the case here. If you want to create a group for all of Trump's presidential travels, create a category. Nyttend (talk) 18:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per UnitedStatesian. Steel1943 (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:CharacterInfoBox

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 14:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is unused and should not be supported. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#Consistency between infoboxes requires that the infobox be in the style of Template:Infobox some subject, additionally, en.wiki has moved away from the CamelCase style. This redirects fails both of these points. Gonnym (talk) 14:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete seems fine here. No significant history. --Izno (talk) 17:03, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:LO

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete LO was short for leftovers, but I doubt anyone remembers that, or would need this cross-namespace redirect. UnitedStatesian (talk) 11:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of the largest waste management companies of the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 14:25, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The target is not a list of waste management companies of the U.S., it is a category containing some waste companies (potentially worldwide). I suggest delete since this doesn't meet the high bar for list redirects to category space. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a consequence of List of waste management companies being redirected to the same category over 8 years ago. It was a bad list but I don't think that was the best idea. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unneeded cross-namespace redirects. UnitedStatesian (talk) 10:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. List of waste management companies#United States is a better option than the status quo, but the section doesn't make any reference to the size of these companies. -- Tavix (talk) 15:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Since the list title is redirected there, I don't see the benefit of deleting the largest companies only. Neither one seems like a good redirect, but getting rid of only one isn't that helpful. I'd rather see this closed as "keep" and then renominated in a joint discussion with List of waste management companies; I could support that. Nyttend (talk) 21:23, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nyttend: List of waste management companies is not currently a redirect, it has become a list article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry, I misunderstood. Retarget to List of waste management companies#United States, as no American companies except the largest will get enough coverage to have articles in the first place. Nyttend (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Per nominator. --Bsherr (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Parturient

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 11#Parturient

Heart pain

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 12#Heart pain

Mind-ray

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 14:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Old redirect to Parapsychology but there is no evidence that this term is ever used in this context. Certainly not mentioned in the article and searches don't find it  Velella  Velella Talk   01:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete as obscure synonym/term. What I got from ""mind-ray" -mindray" google search is the song Gregoria in my "mind - Ray" Charles. --Lenticel (talk) 00:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1999-94 Burnley F.C. season

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obvious error. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 14:39, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Westminster paedophile ring

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 15#Westminster paedophile ring

2010- Fed Cup Europe/Africa Zone Group 1 - Pool C

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's a stray dash that makes this one an unlikely search term. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as implausible search term.
    Talk: Contribs) 04:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2010--11 BCHL season

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The double dash makes this a very unlikely search term. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2005-04-07

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redirects from days created at random are

WP:COSTLY UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Makes no logical sense. Just entering the year gets to the right place far quicker.  Velella  Velella Talk   01:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete only these ones, i.e. this can't be precedent for deleting any other redirects without discussion. No point in keeping these, and no point in keeping most other individual days, but useful exceptions exist (e.g.
    2001-09-11), so we can't go deleting such redirects without bringing them here first. Nyttend (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shut your eyes and think of England

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 9#Shut your eyes and think of England

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_February_1&oldid=883523170"