Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 12

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was restore article. This should be considered procedural; if the redirector still considers the article unsuitable, he may take it to

(non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 15:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Supreme Court of Justice of Buenos Aires → Supreme Court of Argentina  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete this redirect as "Supreme Court of Justice of Buenos Aires"' own article has been already created. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsoriano97 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Alsoriano97: which article are you referring to? This title has never been anything other than a redirect, and no article with a very similar title exists in mainspace or draftspace that I can find. Thryduulf (talk) 21:44, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @
    CommanderWaterford, who was the one who did it in case he wants to argue something. I am using WP tools that I have never used before, so perhaps my nomination is somewhat broken. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 21:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • (
    User:CommanderWaterford to the article on Argentina's national supreme court, which doesn't mention the provincial supreme court. I don't understand why that was done, and I don't understand the nomination, either. This is all rather confusing. - Eureka Lott 22:03, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • I think what is actually being asked for is to restore the article? If so, yes that would seem sensible but I want to hear why it was redirected first. Thryduulf (talk) 00:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Thryduulf: @EurekaLott: that's what exactly I'm asking for. The fact that it is a short article is not (or should not be) a reason to be redirected in less than five minutes to an article about a judicial stay that is completely different. That way it has not been given the possibility to improve it, which I am willing to do. Perhaps I have made a mistake in how I've made the nomination, but my idea is this. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 10:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore article not an appropriate redirect, these are two different courts, same as the District of Columbia Court of Appeals is not the Supreme Court of the United States. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 14:08, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore article (pending any comment from @
  CommanderWaterford:). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:45, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Reinstate article, since we've seen no explanation for the redirection. - Eureka Lott 02:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the discussion was move draft to

(non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 15:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Jordan Oliver → Injustice (professional wrestling)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Deletion, as it redirects to another redirect, unneccessarily causing a double redirect

• You moved
  Jordan Oliver (professional wrestling), and now you want the former page deleted? That's a bad idea. Why did you move it in the first place? We don't use parenthetical disambiguation for human names unless we have material about multiple people with the same name. - Eureka Lott 16:28, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • @
    PabloLikesToWrestle 14:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Ah, that makes more sense than your initial nomination. Thanks for clarifying. I support moving the draft to Jordan Oliver and adding a hatnote about the professional wrestler. - Eureka Lott 18:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Move
  Draft:Jordan Oliver to Jordan Oliver. I'm not sure we've got the process right here but Eureka's right. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:53, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: nomination corrected. The redirect currently points to Jordan Oliver (professional wrestling), which itself is a redirect to Injustice (professional wrestling). Ivanvector's squirrel (^trees/_nuts) 22:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Move
  Draft:Jordan Oliver over the redirect and add a hatnote to Injustice (professional wrestling). We don't actually have an article on Jordan Oliver the wrestler, that article was redirected five months ago. Jordan Oliver (professional wrestling) should stay, it has history. Ivanvector's squirrel (^trees/_nuts) 22:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• @
  PabloLikesToWrestle 17:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Thia discussion has been open for over a week, and it looks like we've achieved consensus. I expect it will be closed soon. Just hang on a bit longer, please. :) - Eureka Lott 02:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Prager Academical Institution → PragerU  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a likely search term for PragerU. –dlthewave ☎ 12:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A search for that exact term in Google shows no obvious hits. Are there any examples of this term being used by a questionable source? Absent evidence of use, I think removal makes sense. Springee (talk) 13:00, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a somewhat humorous oxymoron but is unlikely to be used as a search term. MasterTriangle12 (talk) 06:35, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy disambiguate.

WP:APOS. —Bagumba (talk) 10:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Ayinla → Fatai Ayinla  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Page says It is used because Wikipedia has only one article about a person with this surname, or because one individual is the most likely topic sought by this surname but other well known subjects with the same name exist on the encyclopedia. Would like the page to be moved to a disambiguation page to make way for a film title.

• Support The article Ayinla (film) is about a film about the murder of someone else with the same name. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:43, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate per nom. I started a draft disambiguation page below the redirect. I didn't include the
  WP:PTM. - Eureka Lott 17:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Hey @

  _(talk) 18:19, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  Thanks, TheSokks, that was my initial reaction, too. If that's the case, then we shouldn't include that article on the disambiguation page. - Eureka Lott 22:13, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Support dabify --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:19, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Cock carousel → Female promiscuity  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete:

• Soft redirect to
  WP:RNEUTRAL), but it is a plausible search term with e.g. 133 page views last year. I couldn't find any relevant content on en.wp, and the article in the page history was essentially just a dictionary definition, so soft redirecting to the Wiktionary entry seems best. Thryduulf (talk) 10:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • I could live with that, but I'm curious why
    WP:RFD#D3 would not be relevant here. The Wiktionary entry specificallty says the phrase is derogatory. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • The linked
      WP:RNEUTRAL#Neutrality of redirects section explains why some derogatory terms are good redirects, but basically if a term is (a) likely to be searched and (b) there is relevant content about the term then a redirect will help people find the content they are looking for. The target can (and in many cases should) note any non-obvious concerns around uses (e.g. if it's derogatory, etc), which might be nuanced (e.g. there are terms that are regarded as offensive in the US but not UK and vice versa). Thryduulf (talk) 11:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
      ]