Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 28

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 01:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Bus route 411 → List of bus routes in London#400–499  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are many bus routes called 411, why should this redirect to the London Buses one? In fact, in the same article this redirects to, there is a 411 route listed between Selsdon and Reigate. I propose deletion/disambiguation. — MATRIX! (a good person!)_{[citation unneeded]} 20:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Can't find any other 411 bus routes on WP from a quick search Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• I was about to say keep per Mattdaviesfsic, but there are plenty others so delete as ambiguous (though disambiguation is possible). J947 ‡ ^edits 04:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, arbitrary bus route number that could be used on any system. Ajf773 (talk) 09:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Move without redirect to
  London Buses route 411. This has existed since 2009 as a {{R from move}}. Thryduulf (talk) 11:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. I don't see reason to keep the page history under a different title. User Snigbrook is credited as the page mover at the page history of
  London Buses route 411 too. Jay 💬 10:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was restore article. See also

(non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:00, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

• Ranch House Estates, California → Amador County, California  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a housing development; it might make sense to redirect it to the nearest recognized community, but a redirect to Amador County seems uselessly vague, especially since the Amador County article contains no mention of Ranch House Estates. Suggest deleting redirect, especially since "Ranch House Estates California" is such a vague search term unless one knows precisely which development they're searching for. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 17:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore article without prejudice to AfD per several recent discussions about BLARed places in California. Thryduulf (talk) 11:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).