Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 29

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:53, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 2025 F1 Academy season → F1 Academy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is nothing about the 2025 F1 Academy Season at the target. While it seems rather likely that a 2025 F1 Academy season will happen, with no information there currently, and there unlikely to be a whole ton of information on that season until later in 2024, this should probably be deleted until it can be recreated into an article similar to 2027 Formula One World Championship was deleted at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023 April 5#2027 Formula One World Championship. TartarTorte 19:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• It could be deleted, there is no reason to keep it, however if it is deleted I think it should not be linked to for a few months, to prevent someone else from simply recreating the redirect while there is no still no need. MagicalBear0 (talk) 19:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• African eleephant → African elephant  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An impossible misspelling and extremely unlikely typo (only three non-Wikipedia Google hits). Created solely because it was the canonical example of an extremely unlikely typo on

• Delete per nom, very unlikely typo and near zero page views Polyamorph (talk) 20:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, and
  WP:SALT to prevent recreation without consensus. Thryduulf (talk) 21:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: As implausible; however, should we pipe all red links on that page to Red link example, which is already sysop creation protected to prevent scenarios like this? It know the wikicode would look a bit odd having something like [[Red link example|African eleephant]] but it could potentially make it so people are less wont to create said redirects. TartarTorte 01:00, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • That just gets us back to the situation we had there before the old version of Template:Red link was deleted (
    Cryptic 01:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Weak keep as {{
  R from typo}} dating from 2012. "eleephant" isn't all that unlikely, as a reduplication of a character, is a common form of typo. While the phrase "African eleephant" doesn't seem to appear much, "eleephant" itself does [1] much more. This could also easily be caused by a recurrent sticky key [E] -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • That's, at best, an argument to keep
    Cryptic 04:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • It's not an argument to create those millions of redirects. Just that this already exists, and has for over a decade. And it is a reasonable form to have a typo occur due to the commonly occurring method of single-character reduplication. So, I doubt people will be creating millions of redirects for those various typos, and if they did get created, I doubt they would be a decade old right now. Thus a "weak" keep, from the age of the redirect, and the way the typo is formed. -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 09:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete with so few Google hits it seems implausible especially given Eleephant doesn't exist. Google initially returns 5 results with the duplicates removed but 10 when I chick to show other results. Of the 10 results 7 are from Wikipedia as noted only the other 3 are from outside. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move

Pharmakon (philosophy) over. Jay 💬 07:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

• Pharmakon → Pharmakon—Danish College of Pharmacy Practice  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The Greek word φάρμακον is not exclusively related to a business. The term should lead to the disambiguation page, so people can find what they are looking for, without the distraction of this business promotion. NB: the current target gets 1% of the views of

• Move
  WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, based on pageviews and internet searches. - Eureka Lott 14:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Sounds like a good plan. Is the hatnote already on that page sufficient? -- SashiRolls ^{🌿 · 🍥} 22:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I somehow overlooked the hatnotes at

  Pharmakon (philosophy). I just merged the two hatnotes into a single one. - Eureka Lott 00:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Retarget to
  talk) 12:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment: The simplest would be to delete so that it does not require a page mover to move
  Pharmakon (philosophy) to Pharmakon. But the closer should do what they think most practical. I should probably just have asked for a page move in the first place, but I wanted to be sure there were no concerns about removing the redirect first. I also assumed that procedure would be to redirect to the disambiguation page, but it's true that here there is a very clear primary topic page. -- SashiRolls ^{🌿 · 🍥} 13:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Farming as a Service → As a service  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom Polyamorph (talk) 20:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• IDaaS → As a service  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Identity as a service → As a service  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom Polyamorph (talk) 20:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• BPaaS → As a service  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom Polyamorph (talk) 20:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 05:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Data-Intensive-Computing as a Service → As a service#Data-intensive computing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• DICaaS → As a service#Data-intensive computing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at target (or anywhere else on Wikipedia). * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Social history of the United Kingdom → English society  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The social history of the United Kingdom is broader than "English society", and the English society article covers only the social history of England. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:50, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom to promote article creation. -
  Talkback) 12:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per OP and the above: making this a redlink could encourage a broader article on this important topic. – GnocchiFan (talk) 09:50, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Park Towers (Corner of Park & Cecil Streets) → Park Towers (South Melbourne)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely disambiguator; the streets the towers are located on is not mentioned in the article. Result of being moved shortly after page creation, no incoming links. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. If this is correct (I've not looked), the it would seem like a valid {{R from other disambiguation}}. The fact that it was created at this title speaks to its plausibility. Thryduulf (talk) 11:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:34, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Recently created article moved in the first 15 minutes from a tentative title. The Park Towers dab has similar named titles disambiguated by city, which the creator may have realized, and corrected the title. Delete as we would not want to have street locations of buildings as disambigators, unless there are multiple buildings with the same name in a city. Jay 💬 12:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:06, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Horacio Astaburuaga → Mario Astaburuaga  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It is not at all clear if these are the same person: no mention of Horacio in the target article of refs. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The source cited in the article used the name "M. Astaburuaga". "Horacio" was from a red link in the article Swimming at the 1928 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 metre freestyle and was there when that article was created, so it refers to the same person but could have been a mistake in one of the sources there. Peter James (talk) 11:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Duckmather (talk) 18:33, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unless this specific name confusion is discussed somewhere it doesn't deserve a redirect. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:36, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the talk of the 1928 Olympics swimming article as well.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:30, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Pppery.—Alalch E. 00:12, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Jay 💬 06:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I Am the Very Model of a Scientist Salarian → Mordin Solus  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is context for this as the character sings this line and to some extent it's refered to in the article with the line At one point in the second game, Mordin sings an alternate version of Gilbert and Sullivan's Major-General's Song; numerous critics considered it one of the trilogy's best moments, but the lyrics themselves from this redirect are not included. I'm split on this because I think that some people could potentially find this useful, but without explicit mention it could also be confusing for those who don't know that this is a reference to Major-General's Song. TartarTorte 17:06, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget to wikiquote:Mass_Effect_2#Mordin_Solus, where this lyric is mentioned. Duckmather (talk) 20:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

talk 23:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

• Comment As the one who redirected the article to point to the gesture, I did so because I typed "Dab hand" into the Wikipedia search bar in search of the article about the dance, and was instead directed to the expert page. Not being familiar with the usage of the term described on Wiktionary, I thought this to be an error and retargeted it to the gesture, which I have often heard described as a "dabbing hand" or "dabbing your hand/doing the dab hand". I do not know how common this usage is, and I also do not know what the appropriate solution here is, though my temptation is to suggest that the redirect is replaced with a disambiguation.
  inquire within) 12:07, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Redirect to

inquire within) 12:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

talk 23:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]