Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 25
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 25, 2025.
Tail wing
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 5#Tail wing
Earl Hilliard Jr.
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 3#Earl Hilliard Jr.
Israeli–Palestinian conflict solutions
- ]
Sinai option, one of many proposed "Israeli–Palestinian conflict solutions", was created at the redirect title in 2023, and moved recently by @Lionel Messi Lover. Despite the long history, I think this still should not be pointed directly at any one solution, given both the plural and the fact that this elevates this particular proposal (not, I think, a particularly prominent one) above others. I think this should be a disambig page, though if there exists a good overview page that would make a good alterative target as well. Israeli–Palestinian peace process is the closest I've found, but it isn't very well suited in my opinion. Rusalkii (talk) 01:25, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- I agree with the entire nomination. The only other option I've found is List of Middle East peace proposals#Israeli–Palestinian peace process but I consider that inferior to Israeli–Palestinian peace process - not only does it mark that as the main article, but it doesn't include the Sinai option, the Jordanian option and probably others too. We also don't have a single category or template that I've found that lists the various proposals. Thryduulf (talk) 01:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is support to retarget to Israeli–Palestinian peace process, and I would have closed this, but what prompted me to relist was the nom's words that this target.. isn't very well suited in my opinion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC) - Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Support relisting to Israeli-Palestinian peace process, but I think the page merits an article of its own right. However, it will take time to develop this redirect into its own article. This redirect is a violation of WP:NPOV since it seems like Wikipedia is advocating for the Sinai option. Therefore, I think it should be redirected quite hastily and then developed into an article later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Easternsahara (talk • contribs) 23:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)]
- DAB per ]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This discussion somehow got left behind on the April 13 log page even though that log page was supposed to be cleared months ago. Bringing it back into the fold.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 17:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the find! Human error. Jay 💬 10:57, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Knowledge Graph
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Moved to ]
Editors confusingly opposed moving the target of this page (
Knowledge Graph and should point to Knowledge Graph (disambiguation). For the record, I think this is silly, but it is what it is — can't argue with consensus. InfiniteNexus (talk) 12:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
]
- Oppose -- the result of WP:BARTENDER close, but again, that is not a consensus close; it reflects a general agreement that it should not be Google Knowledge Graph, but there was certainly not a consensus that it shouldn't be simply Knowledge Graph, which is the basis for this "can't argue with consensus" claimed. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 13:27, 25 June 2025 (UTC)]
- Then why on earth would we not move Knowledge Graph if it is the primary topic? This is a {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. InfiniteNexus (talk) 14:25, 25 June 2025 (UTC)]
- There was no consensus to move it to Google Knowledge Graph was not prefered. Part of the argument for the (Google) version there was your claim that it should've been something another editor wanted, rather than reflecting any suggestion that editor had made. Yes, there were editors saying that DIFFCAPS were not sufficient -- two of them cited that essay, but the proposer (you) cited that as well, and the more-than-two "support" votes presumably agreed. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:22, 25 June 2025 (UTC)]
- Whether there was no consensus for any action, consensus against a move, consensus in favor of the status quo, or any combination of the three, the fact remains that WP:TITLEDAB. The purpose of the RM was to rectify this and move the unnecessarily disambiguated title to the undisambiguated one since it is the primary topic, but it was not successful (it doesn't matter how, as a "no consensus" close effectively upholds the status quo, in this case, the continued use of unnecessary disambiguation). Thus, the only other way to sort this out would be to disambiguate since there is apparently no primary topic; if there is a primary topic, then the RM should have passed and the article should have been moved. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:30, 26 June 2025 (UTC)]
- Whether there was no consensus for any action, consensus against a move, consensus in favor of the status quo, or any combination of the three, the fact remains that
- There was no consensus to move it to
- Then why on earth would we not move
- Oppose – no opinion on whatever is happening here, but redirecting ]
- You're right, it should be an RM to move ]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Berlin and Leipzig Railway
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 3#Berlin and Leipzig Railway
Great Storm of 2012
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 11:00, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Great Storm of 2012 → Hurricane Sandy (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Might also referred to 2012 Great Britain and Ireland floods, Great Arctic Cyclone of 2012 or other notable storm in 2012 A1Cafel (talk) 10:31, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete as ambiguous. Most of my (personalised) results relate to a storm that affected north east England in June 2012, but on the first two pages there are also hits related to Hurricane Sandy, a storm impacting north east Scotland in November 2012 and a storm impacting Cheboygan County, Michigan that December. Thryduulf (talk) 12:20, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete as ambiguous. I wish people would stop creating year-based redirects for weather events with no geographical qualifiers; almost every major weather event happens more than once in any given year. Carguychris (talk) 17:32, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Un bandido apodado el Matafácil
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 19:27, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Un bandido apodado el Matafácil → Chespirito (TV series) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Not mentioned in target page leading to
]- Perhaps an episode title. Creator says sorry at User_talk:Sarah_Vilela_Anjos_Pereira#Deletion_discussion_about_Un_bandido_apodado_el_Matafácil. Delete, I assume creator is planning to enhance some lists. Jay 💬 11:11, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Titles that bypassed the "consecutive apostrophes" restriction on the title creation blacklist
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 19:34, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Infection with ''Trichomonas'' → Trichomoniasis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- List of ''Ancient Aliens'' episodes → Ancient Aliens#Episodes (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
These titles bypassed a blacklisted entry on MediaWiki:Titleblacklist that was added to the blacklist in late 2014. (See MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist/Archive 4#Request to add to title blacklist for further details.) Both of these titles were created after 2014. Neither of these have a technical need to exist. (The blacklist entry was created since consecutive apostrophes in titles cause issue with wiki markup on pages.) Delete both. Steel1943 (talk) 04:27, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Cremastra (talk) 15:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete due to violating the blacklist. --Schützenpanzer (Talk) 00:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- No comment on the votes, but just trying to understand. How did these titles bypass the blacklist? Isn't mediawiki supposed to fail their creation? Jay 💬 11:19, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- The title blacklist can be overridden by admins (such as the creator of the first redirect) and page movers (such as the creator of the second redirect). The reason for this is that some titles are on the blacklist due to containing strings commonly used in vandalism or frequently recreated articles, and these can generate false positives. Thryduulf (talk) 12:45, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Feral gummint
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 3#Feral gummint
USFG
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 3#USFG
List of Divisions of the Netherlands in World War II
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these redirects. Rusalkii (talk) 05:44, 3 July 2025 (UTC)]
- List of Divisions of the Netherlands in World War II → List of Dutch regiments in World War II (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- List of Dutch Divisions in World War II → List of Dutch regiments in World War II (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Wrong target, and there doesn't appear to be a divisional list out there. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:04, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Also List of Dutch Divisions in World War II, which redirects to the same article. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:06, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Added List of Dutch Divisions in World War II to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 04:33, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Yonas Kibreab
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on "soft deletion"). Editors can request the redirect's undeletion. Rusalkii (talk) 05:45, 3 July 2025 (UTC)]
- Yonas Kibreab → Elio (film)#Voice cast (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
This actor played in several other films and not only Elio. Elio is probably the most popular one, but it's still not a good reason to redirect. It's better to have it as a red link. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 01:31, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Myung Hyung-seo
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy keep. The nominator is blocked for block evasion, and the only other participant supported keeping the redirect. ]
- Keep per WP:DENY, see AIV report. Regarding the subjects mentioned in several articles, AfD occurred while the subject was in Classy, which is why the redirects point to the group's article rather than to the subject's former groups — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:55, 25 June 2025 (UTC)]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).