Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Criticism of the Roman Catholic Church

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

Involved parties

1. Student7 (talk · contribs), filing party
2. Yozzer66 (talk · contribs)
3. Farsight001 (talk · contribs)
4. Johnbod (talk · contribs)

Filing party: you must serve all of these editors with notifications. See

here

for instructions.

Notified 12:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles involved

• talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views
  )

• Talk:Criticism_of_the_Roman_Catholic_Church#Counting_the_bloodstains_on_the_butchers_apron
  - discussion on article page
• Talk:Criticism_of_the_Roman_Catholic_Church#Bias
  - discussion on article page
• Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography - request for comment

Filing party: Please ensure you have fully read

this guide

before filing.

Read.Student7 (talk) 12:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Issues to be mediated

The party filing this request uses this section to list the issues for mediation. Other parties can list additional issues in the section below.

• WP:POV
• WP:RELY
• WP:BIAS

Additional issues to be mediated

Other parties can use this section to list any others issues they wish to include in the mediation. Please do not modify or remove any other party's listing. Please sign all additions to this section if there are more than two parties involved in this case.

• Additional issue 1.
• Additional issue 2.

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign within seven days, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "Agree" or "Disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed, but can be made at the talk page.

1. Agree. Student7 (talk) 23:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Agree, somewhat reluctantly. I have only commented on the "bias" talk section. Johnbod (talk) 14:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Agree. Yozzer66 (talk) 16:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Agree. Farsight001 (talk) 22:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section; all comments should go on the talk page, unless a party is specifically requested to reply here by a Committee member.

Accept.

For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 22:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Case taken by KillerChihuahua^?!? 13:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]