Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Izaaqnewton/Archive

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Izaaqnewton

Izaaqnewton (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

20 June 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Please look at

Draft:Hamis Kiggundu.. There appears to be some sort of a drive to get this gentleman onto Wikipedia and this makes me suspicious Fiddle Faddle 11:06, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • There's not enough evidence here to convince me that this is sockpuppetry. It's possible that it's meatpuppetry or undisclosed paid editing but that needs to be dealt with separately to SPI. Closing. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19 July 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

While this may be the alleged puppeteer forgetting to log in the puppeteer is also a paid editor. I am concerned that the IP address may be being used to appear to circumvent COI. They are both intimately interested in the life and works of one Hamis Kiggundu

I think this means we need checker, because one is an IP and the other paid, so I am requesting it. I have chosen not to notify the participants Fiddle Faddle 15:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Without evidence that this was intentionally acting in bad faith, I am leaving a warning for both the account and IP and closing without action. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

29 August 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

See

talk) 00:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


20 March 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Total commitment to the sockmaster's client Hamis Kiggundu and his companies

Diffs include:

  • One showing the addition of a Forbes Article image upload to Commons by the sock master
  • Two
  • Three
  • Four Note that Diannaa redacted copyright material so it requires admin goggles
  • Five
  • Six
  • Seven

CU requested though I acknowledge that no information linking any IP with a named account will be released.

The sockmaster is blocked. This quacks as block evasion by being logged out while editing, and is UPE. The sock master is a self identified paid editor Fiddle Faddle 08:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Check declined by a checkuser - I am unwilling to run a check on a series of IPs, find stuff, and essentially link them to that set of IPs. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blocking that many IPs seems sub-optimal. In lieu of that, I've semi-protected
    WP:RFPP is your friend, or ping me directly if you prefer. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:30, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]

05 April 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

The editing by Ibitukirire is suspicious for two reasons. First, Ibi has edited Draft:Haruna Sentongo and has copied Haruna Sentongo into article space, when the draft was created by Izaaq. Second, Ibi popped up at the same time as Izaaq's last unblock request was denied. The unblock requests make the data from Izaaq current so that CheckUser is possible. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Note: might be worthwhile to go through the history of the draft for more socks: the creator, Mark Mulwanyi (

block evasion, given this is a duck case. JavaHurricane 06:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


03 August 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


This editor came to my talk page asking me to restore Draft:Nuhu Muzaata Batte which was a page created by sockpuppet Ibitukirire who was blocked by Mz7. The page was deleted by MER-C as a CSD G5. Ugmatrix's account was created a few days after Ibitukirire was blocked. Liz Read! Talk! 01:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


10 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Just 9 hours after sock Ugmatrix was blocked, the Ddragoner account was created. Both accounts use a very unique userpage style adjustment: Ugmatrix, Ddragoner. Also both of them share the same user talk page headers, that can't be found like that anywhere else on enwiki: search, Ugmatrix, Ddragoner. There is a significant of articles they both edit, mainly focused on the UPE-article Hamis Kiggundu, as well as Diamond Trust Bank (Uganda). Also Ddragoner requested undeletion of Draft:Ham Group of Companies – a draft created by another sock of Izaaqnewton (Mark Mulwanyi). – NJD-DE (talk) 15:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An additional article of overlap is Nakivubo Stadium, where I also noticed blocked duck sock Americanoa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). – NJD-DE (talk) 16:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

This user created their account two days after recent sock Ddragoner was blocked, and edited the same article Patrick Bitature. Also, they copied the article about the UPE-article Hamis Kiggundu to simple wiki. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also noting Newtonizaaq here as I just noticed their edits to simple:Hamis Kiggundu. They are already blocked for UPE here, and were previously mentioned in Mark Mulwanyi SPI. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk endorsed - this looks exceedingly ducky to me. Newtonizaaq is already blocked; I've blocked Ppacot, but I think a CU check might be useful to look for any other accounts, and also potentially to clear up RoySmith's concerns about mismatched hosiery in the 10th September case. Girth Summit (blether) 18:19, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  In progress - ~TNT (she/they • talk) 01:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Expanded results due to continued abuse likelihood:

03 October 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Nothing significant about this account regarding article contributions on enwiki. What is interesting though is that when creating their userpage they copied parts of Liz's userpage to theirs. Especially remarkable the "Due to another username change, I'm now". Previous socks of Izaaqnewton copied parts of Liz's talk page (see SPI report from 10 September 2021). Also they participated on simplewiki in a deletion discussion on an article created by a sock of Izaaqnewton. – NJD-DE (talk) 14:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


09 October 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Recently IP 41.210.155.1 was blocked for abusing multiple accounts as an IP sock of Izaaqnewton. Now Ebbzy reverts to the IPs version of Diamond Trust Bank (Uganda)‎. Requesting CU in order to confirm and request global locks due to the sockfarm's x-wiki abuse. – NJD-DE (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  In progress - ~TNT (she/her • talk) 21:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ebbzy is  Confirmed to Kgl1, and both are  Likely to Ppacot. I note proxy use/evasion.  Blocked and tagged ~TNT (she/her • talk) 21:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09 October 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

They declared being a paid editor, however when comparing their draft Draft:Haruna Sentongo with one of the socks sandbox on simple-wiki simple:User:Ddragoner/Sandbox it's becoming clear this is the same sockfarm. For those wondering: a simple-wiki admin restored the article created by Ddragoner to their sandbox, see conv. simple:Special:Permalink/7736478#Sentongo Haruna).NJD-DE (talk) 21:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While checking the logs of the Haruna Sentongo article on simplewiki, I noticed that a day after Ddragoner's article was deleted there, a user called Haruna Ssentongo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) recreated it. Not sure though if it's really worth mentioning them here as they have only edited their userpage on enwiki. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  In progress - ~TNT (she/her • talk) 21:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Turksy is  Likely to Ebbzy, Ppacot and Haruna Ssentongo, but again, proxy use and other potential evasion.  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation ~TNT (she/her • talk) 21:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Behavioural evidence is clear since all accounts are trying to publish the same spam article. Pink clock Awaiting administrative action - please indef Turksy and Haruna Ssentongo. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 21:49, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Blocked and tagged as a non-CU action, closing ~TNT (she/her • talk) 22:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested for this and the above case. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 03:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14 October 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

New user w/o any prior edit history created an article for Aisha Lubega, and a draft for Haruna Sentongo – a special area of interest of Izaaqnewton socks. Interestingly Deirah has already been cu-blocked on simple. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


29 October 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Hit the ground running as an experienced editor today. Very much looks like UPE. Also remove d the UPE tag from our old "friend" Hamis Kiggundu who is so often the target of this sock master.

I think there is a big enough history to warrant an almost automatic CU because there are bound to be sleepers FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 13:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please can the outcome, assuming SPI is confirmed, be passed to Commons (etc)? They have uploaded an odd picture there. Come to that the picture of Kiggundu is also odd from a prior confirmed sock FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 13:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Spicy as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

-- RoySmith (talk) 14:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Requested glock for the three I just blocked. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks, closing. Spicy (talk) 18:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13 November 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Particular interest in Hamis Kiggundu here, on simple-wiki and commons. Uploads images to commons with exif-data that is extremely similar/virtually the same like uploads by previous socks (camera model, serial number, software, lens used): Condomuse, Ddragoner. – NJD-DE (talk) 15:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting to note is also that they created their account on 29 October 16:32. That's less than two hours after the other socks were blocked. And also they only began using their account a week later. Requesting CU as previous reports uncovered sleepers. – NJD-DE (talk) 15:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Please will the closing process include informting Commons, perhaps also asking for global locks for this farm where not yet actioned? FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 19:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Spicy as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

  •  Clerk endorsed - please check for sleepers per above. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 16:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Condomuse  Confirmed, largely based on some data in cuwiki [2] -- RoySmith (talk) 18:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks, Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested, closing. Timtrent: all previous accounts that I can see are globally locked. Maybe Elcobbola would like to take a look at this from a Commons CU perspective. I'm not sure there is much else to do besides nominating the uploads for deletion. Spicy (talk) 21:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16 November 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Active on Hamis Kiggundu on Simple Wikipedia and Wikiquote. Very little activity otherwise. CU at your discretion since this is an IP. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 13:40, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • This IP has not edited the English Wikipedia since 2019, so there is nothing we can really do at enwiki SPI. I don't see any recent activity that looks like Izaaqnewton on the associated /16 range, either. Timtrent: If an IP editor is disrupting multiple projects you can request a global block at m:SRG, but considering the small scale of the problem (two edits two days ago) I personally wouldn't bother with it right now. (This editor has access to a larger range, but it appears there would be a lot of collateral if it were to be blocked). Closing without action. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 21:12, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

01 December 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

This one is slightly complex. On Commons the new sock has uploaded File:Mr.Hamis Kiggundu.jpg and File:Hamis Kiggundu cropped.jpg, this time with licencing provided by a newspaper under the apparent control of Kiggundu. On Commons they have been blocked as a sock of this master.

I am asking for CU on the basis that these individuals keeping showing up, and thus we may find one and save a bit of hassle

I am asking for global locks to be requested. This is a nasty little sock farm, likely directed by Kiggundu, or paid by him (note that Hamis Kiggundu has an interesting indictment of Kiggundu: "In April 2020 Kiggundu donated food relief to Uganda's COVID-19 task force.[17] He also donated food supplies to over 100 Ugandan journalists through the Uganda Journalists Association,[18][19] but was also criticized for providing cash handouts to journalists.[20]"

So, in summary, this editor has not yet any en WP contributions, but en WP has themes effective SPI system and does they very well. So I have brought it here FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 19:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


14 January 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Added entry for Haruna Sentongo on List of Ugandans by net worth. In their edit summary they are referring to a page on everybodywiki ((Redacted)): diff. This page has been edited there by a "Ugisaacnewton". On simple wiki they created an article linking to that everybodywiki page as well: simple:Special:Permalink/7963365NJD-DE (talk) 11:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


17 January 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Based on username of recently blocked sock an obvious block evasion on List of Ugandans by net worth. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 January 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Kareninaq mine requested that an entry for himself be added on the List of Ugandans by net worth. Tompetert requested on talk page of List of Ugandans by net worth that an entry for Haruna Sentongo should be added to it. Then Kareninaq mine also made post about this at the helpdesk. – NJD-DE (talk) 20:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kareninaq admitted being the same user as Ssentongo Haruna by posting on the latters simple talk page asking why their information is kept being deleted. Noticed another user called "Han Ssentongo" on Commons, and found them here trying to promote same usual person.
Personally, I find it unlikely that they are the real Sentongo Haruna. More likely is that they are on the payroll of Sentongo Haruna and/or Hamis Kiggundu, who despite different last names are brothers.– NJD-DE (talk) 21:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Self admitted. Pahunkat (talk) 10:23, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


30 January 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Obviously one cannot tie this by CU (etc) to any named account, but the interest in rewriting Hamis Kiggundu suggests at least editing while logged out. Administrative scrutiny is required whatever the outcome of SPI 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I just blocked 41.210.147.68 on the same range as one of the IPs above for block evasion. They're editing and requesting restoration of the same UPE articles as the master. I've semi-protected Hamis Kiggundu for a month as they're just going to hop around to evade the block and rangeblocked the /19 for two weeks. I can't find a truly useful edit going back days on that range.-- Ponyobons mots 23:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11 February 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Proforma - all  Confirmed to each other, and to several locked socks. Girth Summit (blether) 18:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


17 April 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Evidence is at c:File:Mr. HamisKiggundu.jpg with the edit/upload summary for 3 Feb 2023: Uploaded a work by Ugisaacnewton from ......

CU requested for sleepers, proliferation etc 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


22 November 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Nanyongaa is a very recent account with very few edits. A sifgnificant one is at the head of Talk:Hamis Kiggundu where they declare a paid interest (albeit with a different paymaster) as one of their first edits, displaying unusual knowledge for a new editor.

Kiggundu is a definite self publicist. If this is not socking then this is (declared paid) meat.

CU requested because this usually shows additional accounts in this sock arena. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Solzbie though a behavioural link via
Draft talk:Balaam Barugahara. Files uploaded by Nanyongaa, articles by Solzbie Both have been active on Wikidata. Nanyongaa has wider cross wiki activity. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Further inspection of edit history leads to Sudhir Ruparelia where Nanyongaa and Solzbiehave each made edits. For me the quacking for these two is loud as a pair of individuals, perhaps less so for the master, though I believe that CU will confirm it. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relevant to this investigation is Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Sudhir Ruparelia 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Confirmed to Africanaz in the archive and to each other. The behavior overlaps are also pertinent. Blocked, locks requested, and closed. Izno (talk) 03:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

01 December 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Newly started to edit Hamis Kiggundu, which is always an indication of puppetry by this master. I'm afraid the farm is so large as to indicate CU 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments