Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 March 3

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< March 2 March 4 >

March 3

Template:Test

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Test (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
)

These *seem* to be the same as the {{

WP:CSD#T3 (duplicate).[reply
]

Better to redirect than to delete, as it may still be used occasionally. Peter James (talk) 20:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm all for that, but what about {{
(What did I break) 20:19, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
There's less of a reason to keep it, as would only be used by admins and its purpose isn't clear from its name. I don't know if any still use the old templates but if anyone does they would be able to undelete if it was deleted. These templates are substituted to users' talk pages, so would the history still be needed? Peter James (talk) 21:13, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:List of bakugan:gundalian invaders episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:List of bakugan:gundalian invaders episodes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete - unused template created in 2010 that was added to Bakugan Battle Brawlers, apparently in an attempt to create an article, and removed only a few minutes later. Peter James (talk) 20:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete per
    G2. It's clear that what's in the template was a test that has nothing to do with the subject. --BDD (talk) 19:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Lists of bus routes in East Anglia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lists of bus routes in East Anglia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template only included 2 pages. The two lists have the Bus routes in the UK template therefore this template is not needed.

(Talk to me!) 16:06, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Monarch of the Glen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:55, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Monarch of the Glen (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MOTG characters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
)

Propose merging

Template:MOTG characters
.
Merge suggested using a merge tag on the talk page. Nominated on user's behalf Ego White Tray (talk) 04:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support merge. Seems logical to me to make 1 template. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:58, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merge -PC-XT+ 13:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:House of Glücksburg (Norway)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:18, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:House of Glücksburg (Norway) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
)

Propose merging

Template:Norwegian Royal Family
.
Nominated on behalf of User:Orland, who placed merge tags on these templates Ego White Tray (talk) 04:27, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • The similar norwegian templates are already merged into no:Mal:Norges konge; which also covers royal buildings, and norwegian monarchy in general. Bw --Orland (talk) 11:35, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disagree These templates fulfill different purposes. Present members of the family get the Norwegian Royal Family template and former/historical members get the Glücksburg-Norway template. That's how it has been on English Wikipedia for years with royal families (not just the Norwegian ones).
    Seven Letters 21:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:France national football team matches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:France national football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:France national team football matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
)

Propose merging

Template:France national team football matches
.
Nominated on behalf of another editor who placed merge tags on the pages. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:21, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per the same both templates. Thank User:Ego White Tray for nominating. Sawol (talk) 01:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Astrobiology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:14, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Astrobiology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Extraterrestrial life (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Astrobiology with Template:Extraterrestrial life.
Nominating on behalf of

User:BatteryIncluded who suggested this on the talk page. No opinion on my part. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you for the technical help submitting this proposal. I propose the merge because both templates deal with the exact same subject, though the "Extraterrestrial life" template is older and more complete. Two possible names after the merge could be "Study of extraterrestrial life" (the common name) or (my preference) "Astrobiology": the study of the origin, evolution, distribution, and future of life in the universe. Cheers,

talk) 14:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Oppose they're separate topics. astrobiology includes xenobiology (extraterrestrial life) and terrestrial biology (per the first sentence in our article on it), so it is an umbrella topic. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - extraterrestrial life is more about specific topics related to the subject than the discipline of astrobiology itself. Wer900 • talk 02:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Army units

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep both. Ruslik_Zero 18:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Army units (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
)

Propose merging

Template:Chain of Command
.
Nominated on behalf of another editor who placed a merge tag on the page. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose {{
    Chain of Command}} is skewed, it certainly doesn't represent all armies in its characterization of force partitioning. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Blackadder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect

Template:Blackadder episodes. The latter contains all links from the former. Ruslik_Zero 18:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Template:Blackadder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
)

Propose merging

Template:Blackadder episodes
.
Proposed template merge out of process using merge tags. Listing it here for discussion on behalf of the editor who placed the tags Ego White Tray (talk) 03:57, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - there are two navboxes which appear on different pages, one linking topic pages, one linking episodes. One unified navbox would offer more consistent navigation between related pages of this topic and allow linking between pages under the same topic. At present it's rather confusing. Cnbrb (talk) 13:13, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_March_3&oldid=1078575084"