Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 30

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log

October 30

Template:Arj Barker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete.

]

With three articles, all fully linked to and from one another, this template does not further aid navigation. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:User Knight Of Carl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. wrong venue Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template created and only used by an indef-blocked user, rather purposeless. Home Lander (talk) 21:42, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's ).

Template:Josué & Trópico Suemba

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete.

]

One transclusion and one related article (NeoSon) which links to and from the main article already. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:BoomBox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete.

(non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Useless navbox with no related articles in which to transclude it beyond the eponymous article. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:16, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Doesn't look like the article is notable either. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 02:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Princesses of Hohenberg by marriage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. See

(non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

One link, one transclusion: fails purpose of a navbox, which is to link articles. Little to no scope for expansion, as few holders of this title are notable. DrKay (talk) 19:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Private Schools in Digos City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

navigates nothing Frietjes (talk) 18:44, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Primera Andaluza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

old and unused Frietjes (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:President's Trophy Knockout Tournament

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused as there are no season articles. general history is saved in Milo President's Trophy Knockout Tournament Frietjes (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Politics of South America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, articles are using {{Americas topic|Politics of}} Frietjes (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Polish Third League 2008-09 Group West

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

old and unused Frietjes (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Polibox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as

G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 20:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

unused, politics sidebars are using {{sidebar}} instead Frietjes (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Plusmarcas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, purpose is not clear Frietjes (talk) 18:38, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Phocidae nav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates navigation found in Template:Carnivora Frietjes (talk) 18:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, redundant with Carnivora navbox. Plantdrew (talk) 21:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Philadelphia Phillies season-by-season records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates Philadelphia Phillies#Season-by-season records Frietjes (talk) 18:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Phelsuma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete.

(non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

unused and "species in genus" navboxes have been generally deprecated in favour of the lists of species in the genus articles and the genus categories. Frietjes (talk) 18:33, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete species in genus navboxes are a maintenance burden, and are redundant to categories and lists in genus articles. Plantdrew (talk) 21:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Perkinsidae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, unclear purpose Frietjes (talk) 18:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Star Trek New Continuity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 15:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:StarStruck Kids

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

single-use navbox (fails

WP:PERFNAV) Frietjes (talk) 15:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's ).

Template:Sports venues

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

appears to be a test page? Frietjes (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Spontini operas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates navigation found in {{Gaspare Spontini}} Frietjes (talk) 15:29, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Speed limits in Europe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, articles are using {{Europe topic|Speed limits in}} instead Frietjes (talk) 15:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:South Western League teamlist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

South Western Football League is defunct Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:South Asian history

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused (replaced by Template:History of South Asia) Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:South African Top Eight Cup Winners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and no parent article? Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:South Africa topic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and slightly confusing since the name is similar to Template:South Africa topics Frietjes (talk) 15:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:South Africa squad - 2009 FIBA Africa Championship for Women

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all redlinks (squad is saved in 2009 FIBA Africa Championship for Women squads#.C2.A0South Africa .5B6.5D) Frietjes (talk) 15:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Sonic music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete.

(non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

unused, all the links are redirects Frietjes (talk) 15:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Some of them did used to be articles, but have been deleted or merged in recent years due to lack of notability. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. JOEBRO64 19:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Solomon Islands Squad 2012 FIFA Futsal World Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as

T3 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 21:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

unused (squad is saved in 2012 FIFA Futsal World Cup squads#.C2.A0Solomon Islands) Frietjes (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Central Counties of Ontario

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete.

(non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The grouping of places in this template serves little purpose. There is no main article for Central Counties of Ontario Tourism Region that gives any context, and the places listed here don't match the "Central Ontario" tourist region anyway. Typical case of

WP:NENAN. -- P 1 9 9   14:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's ).

Template:2017 J1 League table with WD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete.

(non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Spam template created by user to link to his own website

Fram (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:2017–18 Premier League table with WD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete.

(non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Spam template created by user to link to his own website.

Fram (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Champions of Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete.

(non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Doubtful about the usefulness of this as a navigational aid. Note that we don't do navboxes like this for AFL, SANFL, WAFL premiers, etc. Only transcluded on two articles. Jenks24 (talk) 12:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per precedence regarding AFL, SANFL, WAFL premiers, etc. Flickerd (talk) 09:57, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Uw-civil-qa1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete.

(non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

User warning created by now site banned editor. Notably, it is the only one in its series - no one has seen fit to create a level 2, 3 or 4 warning. I suspect this template is rarely used and if used is more likely to escalate tensions than calm them. Indeed, the template appears to have been created by its author to make a

WP:POINT (see [1]) as part of a pattern of problematic behaviour. We need to be conscious of user warning template creep, and we already have {{uw-npa1}} which (if a templated message is appropriate) seems to have broader consensus for use. The use of {{Uw-civil-qa1}} - and problems associated with it - are currently being discussed Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Joefromrandb. WJBscribe (talk) 10:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Hamline Pipers football navbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on

(non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:30, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).