Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 July 7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Shakib-Apu films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template. No need a navigation template for two actors which list films where they acted together. also not all films in this template are notable. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:15, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - there is consensus that we don't have nav templates for actors. While I'm sure people would be interested in a list of films actor A and actor B were in together, such a thing would have to be created using smarter tech and be dynamic and not a manually created navbox with thousands (and possibly much more) of pairings. --Gonnym (talk) 05:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per
  WP:FILMNAV. --woodensuperman 10:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete This film navigational template fails
  WP:FILMNAV. Aspects (talk) 05:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 July 16. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:07, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WikiProject_Australian_law (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
  )

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

• Template:Flipp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This band's navigational template consists of five articles: the band's, one current member, one former member and two related bands that should be removed. With no notable albums or singles and it only being linked to the band's article, there are not enough articles to justify having a navigational template, it currently navigates nowhere and

• Delete. No notable recordings. --woodensuperman 10:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

• Template:Exorcism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This band's navigational template consists of four articles: the band's and three of its members. With no notable albums or singles, there are not enough articles to justify having a navigational template, the articles already link between themselves and

• Delete. No notable recordings. --woodensuperman 10:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:53, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Big East Conference softball coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

NAVBOX with no links to softball coach articles. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:56, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:13, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:1978 FIFA World Cup group tables (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2009–10 Prva HNL league table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2008–09 Prva HNL league table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2006–07 Prva HNL league table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2005–06 Croatian First Football League first stage table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2005–06 Croatian First Football League championship group table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:28, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 08:29, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was Wrong venue See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 7#Module:Synthlisten (non-admin closure) * Pppery * _{... ... ...} 13:54, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Module:Synthlisten (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused module for deprecated (merged) template without any meaningful content (just an import). ~~Ebe123~~ → report 12:08, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Ebe123: Wrong venue Should be at RfD, as modules that do nothing but import another module are functionally redirects. * Pppery * _{... ... ...} 13:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Twinkle did not like my attempt :) RFD is much more focused on proper WM redirects, and not pages that act as one. As it is still a Module, I found this to be the better venue. ~~Ebe123~~ → report 13:33, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Ebe123: Template redirects go to RfD, therefore module redirects like this one should also go to RfD. The fact that Twinkle doesn't understand this is indicative only of a bug in Twinkle; there are very few users working to clean up the module namespace, so bugs can go unnoticed. * Pppery * _{... ... ...} 13:39, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Be bold then! I don't much care where the discussion happens; just that it does, and this seemed suitable. Also, aren't template redirects just wikitext redirects in the Template namespace? That is the substance of my last comment (without response), showing that even as this is functionally a redirect, it is not a redirect in the WP sense of the word. ~~Ebe123~~ → report 13:47, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

      @Pppery: Also, no need to ping me for each reply; I'll get to them :) ~~Ebe123~~ → report 13:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - the module was merged and should have been deleted right after the merge completed as is common with modules. --Gonnym (talk) 13:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was delete Template:Synthaudio. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Synthaudio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Listen (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Synthaudio with Template:Listen.
Duplicates function of {{Listen}}, using a deprecated method of doing so (mw:Extension:Score overriding). ~~Ebe123~~ → report 12:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, or userfy if
  Synthlisten}} distinct (which they no longer are), the content of Synthaudio could have been just embedded in Module:Synthlisten like this (see bottom). Nardog (talk) 12:34, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom. This isn't really a merge, because the pre-existing template already supports the functionality of playing MIDI files. * Pppery * _{... ... ...} 13:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Gonnym (talk) 13:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. All I cared about was that there be inline MIDI playback support on Wikipedia. I implemented it in the way that I did. Some more industrious members of the community have incorporated that work into the main Listen template, something which I had no permission to do at the time. Now that that's done, there's no reason to keep a separate template, etc. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 17:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Fpo top (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{... ... ...} 13:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Fpo1 top (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{... ... ...} 13:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).