Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 June 22

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< June 21 June 23 >

June 22

Mali and Sudan NFT matches navboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All of the matches in these navboxes are in their main NFT articles, making them obselete. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 23:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:DYKY

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems and old unused version of Template:DYKno and not one of the symbols listed at Template:DYKSymbols2. Gonnym (talk) 21:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:DYKX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems and old unused version of Template:DYKno and not one of the symbols listed at Template:DYKSymbols2 Gonnym (talk) 21:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Parenthetical referencing editnotice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 June 29. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Piratenpartij/meta/color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused color template; all parties with this name have their own templates. 47.19.150.58 (talk) 17:35, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Campaign Austria 1809

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Procedural close, discussion duplicates an existing consensus-seeking process. (non-admin closure) ——Serial 14:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following templates shall be replaced by "Infobox military conflict" too:

Propose merging Template:Campaign Austria 1809 with Template:Infobox military conflict.
Campaign Austria 1809 is an infobox. This creates a conflict with the first "infobox military conflict" in the article as only one infobox is allowed. The information provided by "Campaign Austria 1809" cannot be merged into a campaignbox as the campaignbox is not usable by mobile users that represent more than 40% of the users of Wikipedia. The merge will be done into the "notes" area of the "infobox military conflict" Ruedi33a (talk) 11:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Do not merge, but replace with the standard infobox. Merging implies that features in the "Campaign Austria 1809" template be added into the core infobox template. That should not be done in this TfD, but at the talk page of the infobox in question. Gonnym (talk) 11:52, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Correction:
Propose replacing Template:Campaign Austria 1809 by Template:Infobox military conflict.
Campaign Austria 1809 is an infobox. This creates a conflict with the first "infobox military conflict" in the article as only one infobox is allowed. The information provided by "Campaign Austria 1809" cannot be moved into a campaignbox as the campaignbox is not usable by mobile users that represent more than 40% of the users of Wikipedia. Campaign Austria 1809 will be replaced by the standard infobox. The information within "Campaign Austria 1809" will be moved into the area that "notes=" creates within "Infobox military conflict". Ruedi33a (talk) 12:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:FC Viitorul Constanța squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 June 2021 it was announced that

Template:FC Farul Constanța squad will be used. No need anymore for Template:FC Viitorul Constanța squad, so I propose to be deleted. Rhinen (talk) 09:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:AFC Turris-Oltul Turnu Măgurele squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The club was dissolved this year and excluded from Liga II. No player under contract, so no need for a squad template. I propose to be deleted. Rhinen (talk) 09:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:DYKalt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marked as deprecated in 2009 after 1 month. Gonnym (talk) 08:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:DYKre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template was marked by its creator in 2009 after 1 month as deprecated. Not something we usually keep around. Gonnym (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:DYKsug

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template marked as deprecated since 2009 and as it is a subst only, it's unused. Gonnym (talk) 08:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:DYKsuggestion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:55, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template marked as deprecated since 2009. The remaining transclusions should be replaced or subst before deleting. Gonnym (talk) 08:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't appear to be used, nor ever used (no incoming links). Elli (talk | contribs) 05:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_June_22&oldid=1031128294"