Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 11

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< May 10
May 12 >

May 11

Template:NK Rudar Velenje squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template, none of the players currently playing for the club have an article,

WP:NENAN. Snowflake91 (talk) 18:57, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

2012 Summer Olympics handball convenience templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

current convention for Olympics and Paralympics is to place these in the main article and transclude using

WP:LST to avoid creating/watching 40 templates per competition. Frietjes (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

2016 Summer Olympics handball convenience templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

current convention for Olympics and Paralympics is to place these in the main article and transclude using

WP:LST to avoid creating/watching 40 templates per competition. Frietjes (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:2023 T20I Nordic Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template for this table for an annual regional international tournament is not necessary. Similar to most cricket tournaments, standard practice in recent years is to simply create a table within the article 2023 T20I Nordic Cup. Can be transcluded or copied if needed elsewhere. Bs1jac (talk) 13:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree that we've recently started moving away from using templates for these tables, we still don't dupicate tables like it seems is being done at Associate international cricket in 2023#2023 T20I Nordic Cup and 2023 T20I Nordic Cup#Points table. Gonnym (talk) 13:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We always used to have a template used on tournament pages plus the season summary, but several times 2 or 3 years back the templates were getting deleted regardless, so we moved away from them. If having them if used in these two places is in fact acceptable then I wouldn't be against keeping it (although they are sometimes used a bit differently on the season summary). Bs1jac (talk) 14:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are other ways to handle repeated content. Pinging the expert @Frietjes who can help here. Gonnym (talk) 16:47, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gonnym, is this better? Frietjes (talk) 17:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, very! thanks. Gonnym (talk) 21:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Module:Adjacent stations/DB Regio Westfalen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 14:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DB Regio NRW in 2011; all transclusions updated. Mackensen (talk) 12:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage WPT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting deletion like the equivalent template below. Talk pages are for the discussion and record keeping of that article. This template points editors towards an entirely different article like an advertisement. As a result, it heavily contributes to banner blindness and offers no relevance to the actual article at hand. – Aza24 (talk) 06:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting deletion. Talk pages are for the discussion and record keeping of that article. This template points editors towards an entirely different article like an advertisement. As a result, it heavily contributes to banner blindness and offers no relevance to the actual article at hand. – Aza24 (talk) 05:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support this is really just a navigational aid which is not the purpose of a talk page. The project has a banner {{WikiProject Outlines}}. Moxy- 03:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This template supports information that is not relevant to the article. This is contrary to the purpose of talk pages.
talk) 06:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Support per nominator's rationale. Topics that have outlines usually have them prominently linked in sidebars and navboxes. –Vipz (talk) 16:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom; this stuff is redundant with the WikiProject Outlines banner. DFlhb (talk) 06:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Precocious puberty and pregnancy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:17, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This navigation template contains a small number of loosely related articles. Taming Strange involves a male fictional character with precocious puberty and does not mention pregnancy. País do Desejo involves a fictional 12-year-old victim and does not mention precocious puberty. gnu57 00:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Redirect name

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:16, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and per the documentation, not finished since 2014. Gonnym (talk) 00:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wait. I have completely forgotten about this unfinished work of mine. Please give me some time to dig into it and decide between finishing or abandoning it. — Petr Matas 01:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Minimal content. Nigej (talk) 09:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_11&oldid=1155593963"