This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

December 2010

The article Kashi Nath Kaul (Chatabali) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) sources for this subject, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete; Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Kendrick Amplifiers and Guitars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found a few published (gBooks) minor mentions, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 18:09, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete; Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find any published (gBooks) support for the content of this article. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 18:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete; Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Howard Kerzner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced bio, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete; Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article R. R. Keshavamurthy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found a few minor mentions in published works (gBooks) did not find support for notability, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep; References added, notability clarified, prod removed by a rescuer JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Tassadaq Hussain Khan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found only a couple minor published (gBooks) references fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 20:28, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete; Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article KHAOS/KINEMA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 20:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete; Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

Unreferenced minor part of

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 20:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Redirect; To
  Technical University of Tajikistan, by User:Dr. Blofeld, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday
  ) 16:15, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Kilwa (food) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find published (gBooks) support for this article as written, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

The article Kin-Kon-Kan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for published (gBooks) references did not find support for this arrticle as written, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 13:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Kin-Kon-Kan for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Kin-Kon-Kan, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kin-Kon-Kan until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 14:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete Prod > AfD JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Kinson Ravenlock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference failed to find published (gBooks) independent references for this fictional character, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 13:47, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete; Expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Ahmed Abdel Haye Kira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) references for this subject, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 13:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Ahmed Abdel Haye Kira for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Ahmed Abdel Haye Kira, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Abdel Haye Kira until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 14:22, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, Prod > AfD, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) references for this article. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 14:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Multiple references added, article significantly expanded. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Knabber Nossi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found no published (gBooks) references for this subject, fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 14:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete; Expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Kohoutek-Kometenmelodie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 16:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete; Expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Kojima Engineering has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to meet

WP:V

, tagged as unreferenced for 4 years

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 16:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep; Multiple references added, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Kokborok Counting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference failed to find published (gBooks) support for the content of this article, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 16:44, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete. Prod > CSD#A10, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Komren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neighborhoods generally don't meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 16:52, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Single references added, notability not addressed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Koolie Club of Australia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found only a minor mention of the subject in published (gBooks) works. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 16:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete; Expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Kothropita has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for this article. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 17:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, Expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

Fictional characters generally do not meet

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 17:17, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Multiple references added, article significantly improved. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Kralendijk Municipal Stadion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant published (gBooks) mention fails,

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 17:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Künstliche Welten has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:44, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Kytos Project has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference did not find independent support for the content of this artilce, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 17:42, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article La Encarnación (Asunción) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neighborhoods generally dont meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:22, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article La Flor Del Paraíso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article La Tristesse Durera (Scream to a Sigh) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Results = Keep, Multiple references added, Notability addressed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Lamentful Miss has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:07, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Landmines and Pantomimes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no references fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:28, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, References added, notability Not addressed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Lasertrak CD2000 Audio Test CD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found only a few minor mentions, fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 00:53, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Lauer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references did not find support for this article content, unreferenced in other langauges. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 10:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, Recreated as a disambig page, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

No mention of notability no refernces, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 11:31, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of

Lethal Weapon 3 (soundtrack)

for deletion

The article

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lethal Weapon 3 (soundtrack) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 00:45, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Redirect, prod > AfD > Redirect, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Letters and Issues has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No mention of notability no refernces, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 11:37, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Liberalism and radicalism in Argentina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced essay, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Soulreaper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

seems to fail

WP:AFD

, links under "Discography" need references or prod

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 11:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

no mention of notability, no references,limeted edition of 500 copies, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Lincoln Knolls has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neighborhoods generally don't meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:33, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Linnaeum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references {Linnaeum tweeter) found only a couple published (gBooks) minor mentions fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:38, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

No mention of notability, no references,limited edition of 1,000 copies, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

No mention of notability, no references, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:44, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, multiple references added, Notability addressed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

per suggestion merged to Molde no incoming links except redirects to delete when prod expires

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:59, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Merge and redirect, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

The article List of Marvel vs. Series characters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A long unreferenced orphan without a clear reason to exist, fails

WP:NOT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:41, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found lots of mentions of the tittle in connection with people who are notable, but no indication that the tittle meets

WP:V

as well

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Multiple References added for people with the title. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Little Grunt and the Big Egg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found a more then 100 published (gBooks) mentions, in unrelated publications. But they all seem to be in lists of kids books, with no special mention of notability. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:39, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Multiple references added, Notability addressed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article A Little Soap and Water has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found a few minor mentions, fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of A Little Soap and Water for deletion

The article A Little Soap and Water is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Little Soap and Water until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 02:27, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Prod > Prod > AfD, Multiple references added, Notability addressed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:51, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Live from the Planet Archives: Volume 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found no published (gBooks) references, no indication of notability. Fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 03:01, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Live from the Planet Archives: Volume 1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found no published (gBooks) references, no indication of notability. Fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 03:02, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Lochhaven has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neighborhoods generally don't meet

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 12:04, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 12:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Redirect, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Locust Manor, Queens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neighborhoods generally don't meet

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 12:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Multiple references added, notability addressed, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found only a minor published (gBooks) mention of Greek "Cruiser" named Lonchi. Fails

WP:N

if any content here is true

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 12:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep Multiple references added, article significantly improved. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

The article London 2012 Olympic youth ambassadors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) references and only a few online mentions, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 12:54, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:58, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found "it exists" name listed in a few books, but nothing else. Fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 13:02, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Redirect, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 12:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Lonely Crowd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found detail mostly about David Riesman's 1950 book, with little about this rock band. There are some claims of notability in the article but I was unable to confirm those claims. Fails

WP:V

. The Norwegian article is nearly identical to this one and also unreferenced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 23:13, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 12:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) in English supporting the content of this article. It has been tagged to add references since October 2006. Without references and unable to find support the article fails

WP:V

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:49, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Multiple Spanish language references added, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 12:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for the primary word combination in this article in any language, fails

WP:V

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:55, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Multiple Spanish language references added, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Luv Your Life has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 23:49, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, single reference added and notability addressed JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Maa Destmal Aawordaim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for the content of this article, fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 00:06, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:05, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Mac Operator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references had difficulty in finding published support for the content of this article. The position appears to exist, but did not find anything significant beyond that. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 00:13, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Mac Operator for deletion

The article Mac Operator is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac Operator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 00:26, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, Prod > AfD JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

Streets generally don't meet the requirements of

WP:N

, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 00:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, References (external links) added, notability remains questionable. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Archie McLeod has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for the content of this article. Fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 00:42, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Single reference added, notability remains questionable JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:15, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Maculospinal reflex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found 3 published (gBooks) works on the subject, one of which showed the body of this article to be a copyvio. with only minor mentions in 3 works fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 01:08, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Maculoocular reflex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Majority of content removed as copyvio, no in coming links, fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 01:12, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Madhyahnikam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find support for the content of this article, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 01:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article MagCom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Opening sentence defines subjects failure to meet

WP:N

, unreferenced orphan

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 01:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep Multple references added, notability addressed JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Maldivian honours system is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maldivian honours system (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 11:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, AfD delete JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Maltby railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found the only published (gBook) references in the novel "The Fifth Form at Saint Dominic's" By Talbot Baines Reed, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 11:43, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, References added, article improved. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Malvern Link railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found two published (gBook) minor mentions of the station, fails

WP:STATION

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 11:51, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep Multiple references added, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

The article The Man They Could Not Hang (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found mostly primary sources for this book. The film, the phrase, and the man, seem to have multiple significant mentions, but the book does not seem to meet

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 12:05, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, References added, notability of the book remains questionable JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article La Mañana (Morocco) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references could not find published (gBook) mention of this newspaper, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 12:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Manar Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBook) references for an island group "Manar Group", the word combination is previlant, but nothing found with "island", Web hits are wiki mirrors. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 12:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Manar Group for deletion

The article Manar Group is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manar Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 15:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Merge/Redirect Prod > AfD (there are multiple layers of complexity in this deletion suggestion) JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article MaO Arena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBook) support for this article. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 14:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Marianus I of Arborea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for this article, fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Multiple references added, notability addressed, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for this article, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 16:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of

Maritimer English

for deletion

The article

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maritimer English until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 15:42, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep and rename, Prod > AfD, References added, name change clarifies notability JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:44, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Martial arts equipment is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martial arts equipment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 17:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, AfD Delete JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Bridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found several "Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Bridge"s. None of them seem to have any claim that meets

WP:N

, they all exist and that is about it.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 17:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep Two local references added, notability remains questionable. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Maryland Association of Correctional & Security Employees has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for the content of this article. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 17:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Meadowlands Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found only wiki mirrors, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 19:43, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Megasound has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found four published (gBooks) minor mentions for "Mega Sound" (Megasound is less productive) with "Warner Bros". Other then it exists no support for the content of this article is found. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 19:55, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, multiple references added, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Mehboob-e-Yazdaan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found LOTS of self promotation web pages, and no published (gBooks) references, no mention of notability in article fails

WP:N

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 20:02, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Methylene shuffle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found two published (gBooks) minor mentions that can not be used to validate the content of the article. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 20:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for the content of this article. Fails

WP:V

. Both other language articles are also unreferenced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 17:47, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Results = Keep, References added, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article MI15 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for this article, fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 18:01, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Results = Keep, Single reference added, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for this article, fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 18:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Redirect, Reference added then redirect, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Microphone stand is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microphone stand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep AfD > Keep, no article improvements JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Mid Banesore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no support for the content of this article. Web is all mirrors and gBooks is no hits, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 18:36, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Mid Banesore for deletion

The article Mid Banesore is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mid Banesore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

• Results = Pending Prod removed, no reference supplied needs to go to AfD, Unclear if Hoax, language barrier, translation spelling, or some other unknown obstetrical to finding references. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Submit for AfD JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:43, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Results = Delete AfD closed Delete, JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:29, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found no support for the content of this article. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 19:01, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Reference added JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
• Lesson learned; RSSSF is a
  WP:RS JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday
  ) 16:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Military Rule Medal,1987

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found no support for the content of this article. Fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 19:46, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, single reference added,
  Reliability of source and notability remain questionable. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday
  ) 16:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Midwest Skies and Sleepless Mondays has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) references for this article. Lack of clearly independent

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 12:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Mini Comet/Little Comet (Hersheypark) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 12:53, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod

The article Mipo Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no support for this article, fails

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 13:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:37, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Miss Peaches has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no support for the many claims to notability listed in the article. Fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Multiple references added. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:39, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Mississippi Fire Dogs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found lots or Wikipedia mirrors, but no independent

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod

The article Miyaviuta -Dokusou- has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found no independent

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Multiple references added, Notability addressed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Mochikoro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no independent

WP:V, similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kin-Kon-Kan

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:53, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Mochikoro for deletion

The article Mochikoro is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mochikoro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, Prod > Afd > delete

The article Moelfre (hill) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced article with no mention of notability, fails

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 22:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, multiple references added, notability addressed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Monarchist National Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found only a few minor mentions,

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 23:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Multiple references added. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A few mentions online support the existence of the league, no published (gBooks)

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 23:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep Multiple reference added JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Monkey Fuzz Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found no published (gBooks)

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 23:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for reference found a few mentions of this term, it appears the more popular term is

WP:N

unreferenced for 4 years

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 23:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Rename, substantially reworked, multiple references added JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:42, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Monster Player Kill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found a single published (gBooks)

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 23:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete, Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Montrain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 00:09, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, Primary source added, notability not addressed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Montserrat Championship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Keep, RSSSF reference added. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:47, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Moodswings and Roundabouts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks)

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 01:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The article Moonblood/Nema Split EP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 01:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Results = Delete Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found 2 minor mentions in published

WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 01:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of

Morales Pino Trío

for deletion

The article

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morales Pino Trío until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

• Results = Rename Prod > AfD > Rename, multiple references added, notability addressed. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The article More or Less (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally don't meet

WP:N

, no references, no mention of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 01:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Delete Expired prod JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The article

because of the following concern:

A search for references found no

WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 02:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

• Results = Rename Multiple references (external links) added, Notability questionable but probable. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)